Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 11:59 AM

I have modestly (....) and shortly (...) called this
"My demostration that the creation and existence of a TOE would lead to an infinite paradox"

A TOE means TOE, which is theory of everything, indeed, I don't know who gave that name first, but s/he was too exagerated. If a theory of everything would really be a theory of everything, then that theory (the theory of everything) should also be a theory of the theory of everything, which is part of the everything in it's name, here we get the first paradox, because how on earth would aa thoery be a theory of itself?...ex. It would be like using the word transport when trying to define transportation.
Secondly, we carry on, and the theory of everything should be a theory of itself, but that theory hould be a theory of that theory, and the same theory should be a theory of that theory, and there should be another theory to explain that theory...........................and it carries on for ever and ever, in never ending.

What do you think about it?

	(#1 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	The TOE Paradox - 04-19-2005, 05:27 PM I have modestly (....) and shortly (...) called this "My demostration that the creation and existence of a TOE would lead to an infinite paradox" A TOE means TOE, which is theory of everything, indeed, I don't know who gave that name first, but s/he was too exagerated. If a theory of everything would really be a theory of everything, then that theory (the theory of everything) should also be a theory of the theory of everything, which is part of the everything in it's name, here we get the first paradox, because how on earth would aa thoery be a theory of itself?...ex. It would be like using the word transport when trying to define transportation. Secondly, we carry on, and the theory of everything should be a theory of itself, but that theory hould be a theory of that theory, and the same theory should be a theory of that theory, and there should be another theory to explain that theory...........................and it carries on for ever and ever, in never ending. What do you think about it? Last edited by Guille : 04-20-2005 at 11:59 AM.