[humanbydefault]

The last couple of months I've been working on a easy-to-understand physical model that would allow, particulary those interested in the weirdness of the quantum world, to guide them in the personal search for the TRUTH of our reality.
The reason I called it "Clock Model" is simply because that is exactly what it looks like... Allow me to explain:
After the official announcement in Mach of this year about the property finally observed in neutrino oscillation and their assumed mass [There is an article posted by Robert right now about this subject on the main page] scientists have focused their attention in how to replace the "Standrd Model" as the earlier fundaments for the "Human Catalogue of Particles."
Don't be concerned about it! Do you know how many Noble Prizes have been awarded to scientists that turned out ultimately WRONG? I'd say... TOO MANNY!

The thing is that I constructed [mentally] the process that might explain to us the internal structure of every single elemental quantum supplying at the same the WHY and HOW reality seem so fuzzy and unreachable during observations.

"THE CLOCK MODEL"

Let's assume that we have an interesting CLOCK that looks and works ALMOST like those we use daily to check the time. Only this one will function a little bit different. The larger arm [the one that normaly show minutes] will be the one running slow. The short arm [the one ussually marking hours] will run faster and in opposite direction with respect to the counterpart.
The reason I changed the functions is pretty LOGICAL: I presented a couple of THREADS ago a personal THOUGHT EXPERIMENT based on two circles with different radius where light would move around. The conclusion of such experiment would come up [no doubts about it] with an obsrvable LAG between both photons. The reason was pretty obvious: "IF ACCORDING TO EINSTEIN LIGHT MOVES AT THE SAME SPEED AND ONE BEAM HAS TO COVER A LARGER CIRCLE [DISTANCE] DURING THE SAME TIME ANOTHER BEAM WILL HAVE TO DO THE SAME INSIDE A SHORTER ONE... THE OBVIOUS ANSWER WILL BE THAT AFTER A CERTAIN LAPSE OF TIME THERE WILL BE A "LAG" [RETARD] SHOWED BY THE BEAM FORCED TO RUN A LARGER PATH."
I suppose everyone will agree in this simple analogy... It's pretty convincing isn't it?
The above (weird) thought experiment dictates that the larger arm of my "clock" will be the one moving slower since that will represent the concept of the greater radius.
Why moving in opposite directions? That's yet simpler: Because when you observe a LAG between two co-related systems [relatively speaking] you'll end up having the correct impression of one moving backwards with respect to the other.

Now let's see how it works:

Let's begin with the first example, "It is 12 o'clock" Both arms point up to the number 12 and both arms are also in the same direction! This example represents the addition of both waves in the vacuum giving as a result the conditions to observe a new "particle." As both arms continue with their rotation they will reach a point where an angle of 90 degrees between them is observable. At this precise moment a different kind of "elemental particle" will appear on front of our instrumentation. This one is not having the same energy density as the first one observed but it will have enough stability to become part of the physical reality. As time continue there will be a point where both arms will be at 180 degrees... A complete cancellation of energies. It may be a residual energy in the vacuum but, due to our own limitation in its proper measurement, that region of space or eather will be empty once again. The cicle will be resumed with the same procedure only in its symmetrical pattern.
This way I could explain [the easiest way possible] how three different configuration of the same REALITY comes to life without violating any rule or human LOGIC.
The same MODEL explains why there is an inherent component of space-time
involved in the structure of the alleged "particle" [quantum] that could give us the basis for the final understanding of the physical origin of CHARGE.
To me CHARGE is the result [actual orientation] of the component waves of a given system during their spin. Just like seen in my Clock Model above every "elemental particle" will present a different charge in direct correspondance with the actual pattern and density of its components.
My next post [right here] will describe accordingly with this MODEL why quantum mechanics is unable to predict with entire exactitude the final position of "particles" [like electrons] after the collapse of the so-called "wave function." Why quantum entanglement is not able to explain why the final conclusions of the EPR experiment do not corresponded with Einstein's predictions... Don't miss it!

HUMANBYDEFAULT