View Single Post
"to Be Or Not To Be"
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
humanbydefault
2nd degree Black Belt
humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 18x in 14 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
Post "to Be Or Not To Be" - 04-22-2006, 12:04 PM

When Mawell conceived the propagation of electro-magnetic waves he proposed a combination of two fields [electric and magnetic] alternating each other in the same wave format. In fact today's theories make a difference between the way light propagates across the eather and "sub-atomic particles" do. According with theoretical arguments light belongs to the Boson family while electrons [for example] to Fermions. Those are facts no one denies.
But why is it that makes impossible to have a complete knowledge about the electron's "own states" [eigenstates] including momentum and position?
The answer [the way I see it] is found in the understanding of that what Maxwell proposed a long time ago.
What is in fact the nature of the magnetic field?
The magnetic field of a quantum propagating through space is the status of the interaction between the component waves [integral part of the given quantum]. If you go back to my "CLOCK MODEL" you'll see that when the waves making for the actual electron propagation are in synch. [12 o'clock] the magnetic field acquired its maximum value.
How about the electrical field or charge of the electron at 12 o'clock?
It is ZERO! Of course you would ask yourselves then... and what does that mean?
It means that at that specific point in time that electron is 100% momentum. It is a pure wave with all its energy content expressed in the strength of its magnetic field... Remember how they called it back in the thirties? "The Bohr's magneton." The same one responsible for what we measure as SPIN.
When our "Clock Model" marks 6 o'clock an interesting phenomenon will take place... The magnetic field will reduce its magnitude to almost ZERO transforming all its strength into a different type of reality: CHARGE! Then we observe the actual charge of the electron! But you may ask... What happen to the momentum of the quantum when the collapse takes place?
It simple disappears! That will also mean that the particle ceased to move and it's now a localized charge we can measure as the electrical energy of the electron (!) At this point is ALL POSITION.
The difference then between Fermions and Bosons is pretty understandable from this point of view: Bosons do not become units of charge when collapsed due to the actual density of the energy involved in their component waves. When white light collapse into a sensor it does not show in our instruments as any sort of charge while the two waves making for Fermions do. In the two slit experiment we saw that the results derived from observation will demonstrate that both [Fermions and Bosons] behaved the same way with the only difference that using photons we needed a light sensor when using electrons we captured their electrical charge instead.

This new model could explain the mystery involved in the final spectrum observed in the screen every time the "Two Slit Experiment" is performed with single frequency photons!!!
Follow me on this line of thought and you'll see it!
If instead of a SINGLE wave what we consider to be a PURE photon or elemental quantum [taking an infrared photon as an example]... Reality would be cheating at us a big time! I mean photons would be the actual result of two component waves in their propagation at 12 o'clock !
Since the actual wavelength of those two [virtual] waves are different the collapse of one of them will prompt the other wave to collapse too into a final and definite position>>> The moment we measure one photon. Since the entanglement of the electromagnetic waves component of a given photon of light can not be observe WITHOUT COLLAPSING IT we will never be able to verify their [plural] existence (!)
If I'm right every photon of light [no matter its frequency or intrinsic energy] will alternate its EXISTENCE as they propagate across the vacuum in the universe... Just as neutrinos do (!) No way we could actually prove this hypothesis in 2006 but who knows what the future holds...

HUMANBYDEFAULT
  
Reply With Quote