[humanbydefault]

L.G. I have some troubbles trying to follow your thoughts. I guess I got something out of the image that you've just mentioned but I'm not completely sure about it... Could you give me an example of your idea so I could give you a sincere opinion?

On the mindtime I have more to say about the possibilities open to us after MINOS events.
For what I'm going to write in this post I 'll need once again the help of my thought experiment of two circles with different radius and its direct results.
I hope everyone reading my posts lately will agree that the speed of light is the same as the transfer of information from point A to point B. If those two points are localized at a greater distance one another then it is logical to assume that a wave moving at light-speed will take longer to arrive to the destination=observer.
If we were to explain the presence of a spinning quantum of energy inside the atomic structure we would have to refer necesarly to an obvious relation radius-energy-density. I don't think that chance or coincidence has anything to do with the fact that protons are spinning in a deeper level [radius] than electrons. Would I be wrong assuming the "two circle experiment" as a basis to state that the "inter-atomic fabric of space-time" inside the proton zone is "moving" at a higher elapsing rate of time?
I think is pretty obvious that energy spinning in that small radius will have to be very dense in order to balance the negative charge of electrons with a larger radius. If we included the eather analogy at those small distances in atomic orbitals it would be easy to believe that the concept of relativity is also present inside harmonics of different levels. If we took those basic concepts and put them together in a final conclusion I'd say that atoms "feel attracted" by others because of their temporal nature. Time elapses with relative speed between different mediums accordingly with their inherent energy density. I used a sci-fi terminology refering to this aspect of physics... I named it "Temporal Mechanics." Following that idea I could see two different quanta being attracted one toward the other as a consequence of their different space-time variables.

Changing subjects>>> Tell me if you don't see entanglement as the same phenomenon occured with neutrino oscillation but instead of two waves moving in the same direction two interwinned waves moving in opposite one?
I see three elemental patterns of wave-interaction:
1>>> two waves moving in the same direction interacting in the creation of three different quanta as they go... as in neutrino oscillation from electron- to Muon- to Tao-.
2>>> Two entangle waves moving at 180 degrees [opposite direction] unable to create matter-particles [fermions].
3>>> Two entangled waves colliding in a head collision producing a STANDING WAVE PATTERN [interference] ... as in the making of matter>>> atoms.
In all cases above those two waves have been entangled by different reasons. Standing waves are the result of two waves interfering in their propagation producing a spin and a third type of energy-wave or what's the same, a new harmonic.
This type of interactions are the one making charge particles [protons, electrons etc.] The energy scaterred from neutrons after their decay will be the model posted in point 2.
I've got some difficulty trying to understand how could physicists are trying to explain the atom with the help of particles assumed to "get there" by a casual attraction instead of conceiving the atom as a perfect structure built from the very core toward the outer harmonics.
The theory using fields is considered today to be the closer to reality. The way I see it there can't be any charge at all moving inside the atom. Since all there is are waves spinning as the consequence of interference occuring at the very core of the atom. Remember what I wrote about when we are in the presence of PURE MOMENTUM and when PURE POSITION?
Pure momentum is referred to magnetic fields and that's all we find built inside those harmonics we interpret as "sub-atomic particles."
Pure charge is only obtained when a pair of waves making for a quantum is collapsed into pure POSITION. That is only possible OUTSIDE the atomic structure!
The only reason every single atom in the universe present a perfect NEUTRALITY [no charges to observe] is because atoms are PURE MOMENTUM! Waves in a permanent spinning motivated by deeper interferences. We can not "collapse" waves spinning around the atomic nuclei (!) simply because we don't have access into those structures! The reason why we can't collapse matter is pretty evident: The energy involved in the making of matter [atoms] is so strong and incredibly high that those standing waves act like literal "FORCE FIELDS." (!)
My point is that we should stop confusing ourselves about the nature of electrons inside the atom [which there are none as we imagine them] and those quanta with positional-charge OUTSIDE THE ATOM.
Inside the atom are only levels of energy spinning with diferent density and space-time realities. They make for atomic oscillators capable of transforming previously absorbed energy into photons, neutrinos or outside-electrons.

This is my way of looking reality. Was I mistaken? Maybe... Nobody's perfect!

HUMANBYDEFAULT