"...Yet one can point to zones within the assemblage where less than a full charge resides, such as the area around an atom's nucleus. This is possible in part because particles are not like mathematical points--which must be either inside a zone or outside it--but are smeared out by the
uncertainty principle of
quantum mechanics. Because of this smearing effect, if you define a sufficiently small zone, a fundamental particle may be both partly inside and partly outside it..." (Wikipedia).
The fragment above was posted in the following web page>>> Check it out!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_charge
Do you still remember my "Clock Model"...? The point referred on that specific page about the alleged "side effect" due to the so-called "unceratinty principle" is clearly understood analyzing the status of the standing wave at 3 O'clock and 9 O'clock. I expalined the REAL "transition" of the spinning wave in the three spatial dimensions.
For references you could visit:
http://www.toequest.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1667
In the thread "D e c o d i n g >>> Light" I gave you the true image of what's really going on inside a close pattern formed by a two-waves-entanglement.
Since every single layer in the structure of the atom is in a 100% MOMENTUM where NO CHARGES are present whatsoever... It wouldn't be to hard to imagine that during the different phases of the spin (360 degrees) the strength of the magnetic field will progressively change as the given orbit (harmonic) closes the loop. We could only speak of "whole charges" when:
1>>> Both wavelengths were in phase>>> 12 O'clock(!)
2>>> Both wavelengths were in opposite phase>>> 6 O'clock(!)
However at 3 and 9 O'clock both halves of the strength of the magnetic momentum have been split in 2 (two) spatial dimension (!)
I believe that it is at 3 and 9 O'clock the points we see as the place with the electrons could be "up" and/or "down." That specific inter-atomic region is the one ACTIVE in the making of BONDS between atoms.
What I trully find amazing is the fact that it is precisely the coupling or bond between atoms that makes molecules to present partial polarities and therefore the (further) OPTIONS to allow more bondings ahead.
Just look what happens with the molecule of water. If we were to apply the old concept of "whole charges" it would practically impossible to explain what we know today as HYDROGEN BONDS. In other words, the bond between two hydrogens "willing" to donate one (1) electron to the incomplete orbit of the atom of Oxigen would be the end of the story. Water wouldn't even exist as a real possibility which we know it is an absurd (!)
That puzzle along with others are being explained thanks to the wave-analysis of the orbits brought to you by the "weirdness" of quantum mechanics. WEIRDNESS because the THEORY insists in keeping the duality "particle-wave" and what's worse yet the EXISTENCE OF CHARGES phisically present inside the atomic structure.
Would you asked yourselves what is the exact value measuring the strength of the CHARGE acting between molecules of WATER? Would that be a "whole number" by any chance? I didn't think so either!
The Standard Model conceives the actual EXISTENCE of fractional CHARGES interacting inside the atomic structure. With 1/3 th. of a CHARGE and its variations scientists are trying to justify a REALITY they should know by now it is totally ABSURD.
Bonds are brought into a physical reality when the perfect MATCH between two atomic orbits find themselves close enought to "feel" their magnetic "push."
Orthodox physics states that a bond between two atoms is the result of a SHARING PROCESS using their "electrons" to complete their available "empty space." I am perfectly aware that today's quantum mechanics "signed" a convenient "COMPROMISE" leaving the nature of "electrons" to be ASSUMED as it fits more convenient to the specific situation. When it fits to consider an electron (inside the atom) as either a "particle" or a "wave" it moves from one extreme to the other with entire FREEDOM (?)
I [however] have EXPOSED the WAEKNESS of Quantum Mechanics as an incomplete THEORY to explain the atomic structure <in WRITTING and for the first time > by DENYING THE PRESENCE OF CHARGES INSIDE THE ATOM.
Even Albert Einstein himself believed in the physical presence of real ELECTRIC CHARGES inside the atomic structure (!) I have always felt puzzled by the fact that the brightest physicist of the XXth. Century could have missed such important piece of the puzzle and one that could have helped him to prove the incompleteness of the Theory... (?)
My next comment about this important side of Reality will bring to you some insides concerning TIME in the nature of those "Chemical Bonds."
Until our next encounter...
HUMANBYDEFAULT