[Guille]

Originally Posted by harmonygirl Guille, I get the sense that you feel something is missing? If you are able to posit that the current branches of philosophy may be incomplete, have you then noticed an area of incompleteness?

Something is missing. A future philosophy. HTS is correct. These branches are all incomplete, individually and collectivelly. But what I say is not an 'area' of philosophy, it is more a 'part' of it. By part I mean something which is missing in the whole of it, in the process of it, there is a part missing. Not an area, as in a type of philosophy. This is part of what I'm constructing, the study of the meaning of analysis (my long post in the thread 'The Problem With Problems' includes many thoughts), and the whole idea of philosophy. Basically, it is philosophy of philosophy, but not being metaphilosophy, it is philosophy out of philosophy. Strange but true.