Theory of Everything - View Single Post

humanbydefault · **E U R E K A !!! -** 05-02-2006, 11:14 AM

I was doing a rutine search in the internet and I bumped into a book. At first glance it seemed like the classic "more of the same" but as I went deeper into the argument I found myself totally IDENTIFIED with what the author of the book, Mr. Dewey B. Larson, had published in it.

The following is the link to his book:

http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/cana/

I believe the title of his book was "The Case Against the Nuclear Atom." It is a book written after a great deal of research based upon the personal opinion and individual beliefs of those who have contributed the most with today's level of progress.

I want to add one more reason why those sincerely interested in defining what the TOE is all about should dedicate some spare time to the reading of this incredibly brilliant exposition of facts and LOGIC analysis in regard with the past, present and future of physics.

There was no doubt in my mind ever since I started to work out an ideal model of the atomic structure that the SOLUTION of the true physical representation of the atom HAD TO INCLUDE at the same time the UNIVERSAL PATTERN from where every single aspect of the universe could be properly EXPLAINED. I believe Mr. Larson did a remarkable job by stating all those things I've been identifying inside my mind with the help of images and sort of "alien" language that have guided me all these years.

The book FOCUSES at all the aspects of particle physics IN A SIMPLE AND BEAUTIFUL LANGUAGE >>> NO MATHEMATICAL EQUATIONS OR COMPLEX ABSTRACTIONS. It is my humble opinion that books like the one Mr. Larson wrote are the ones that should be recomended in the home page of TOEQUEST. The reason is pretty simple: If there is a TOE and we were some day in a position to finally be able to understand its benefits and limitations that amazing theory won't be like the ones we have right now under the term "official."

Let's meet right here and discuss those topics that you found "familiar" to everything we have said and argue about right here in this FORUM.

UNTIL MY NEXT ENCOUNTER... Right here!

HUMANBYDEFAULT

	(#1 (permalink))
humanbydefault 2nd degree Black Belt Status: Offline Posts: 328 Thanks Given: 2 Thanked 18x in 14 Posts Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 16	E U R E K A !!! - 05-02-2006, 11:14 AM I was doing a rutine search in the internet and I bumped into a book. At first glance it seemed like the classic "more of the same" but as I went deeper into the argument I found myself totally IDENTIFIED with what the author of the book, Mr. Dewey B. Larson, had published in it. The following is the link to his book: http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/cana/ I believe the title of his book was "The Case Against the Nuclear Atom." It is a book written after a great deal of research based upon the personal opinion and individual beliefs of those who have contributed the most with today's level of progress. I want to add one more reason why those sincerely interested in defining what the TOE is all about should dedicate some spare time to the reading of this incredibly brilliant exposition of facts and LOGIC analysis in regard with the past, present and future of physics. There was no doubt in my mind ever since I started to work out an ideal model of the atomic structure that the SOLUTION of the true physical representation of the atom HAD TO INCLUDE at the same time the UNIVERSAL PATTERN from where every single aspect of the universe could be properly EXPLAINED. I believe Mr. Larson did a remarkable job by stating all those things I've been identifying inside my mind with the help of images and sort of "alien" language that have guided me all these years. The book FOCUSES at all the aspects of particle physics IN A SIMPLE AND BEAUTIFUL LANGUAGE >>> NO MATHEMATICAL EQUATIONS OR COMPLEX ABSTRACTIONS. It is my humble opinion that books like the one Mr. Larson wrote are the ones that should be recomended in the home page of TOEQUEST. The reason is pretty simple: If there is a TOE and we were some day in a position to finally be able to understand its benefits and limitations that amazing theory won't be like the ones we have right now under the term "official." Let's meet right here and discuss those topics that you found "familiar" to everything we have said and argue about right here in this FORUM. UNTIL MY NEXT ENCOUNTER... Right here! HUMANBYDEFAULT