|
Originally Posted by Mike 5 This part of the Forum is about String Theory and specifically I posted about M Branes and the collisions between parallel universes.
The central point for this forum is that for me if parallel universes collide, and I like this idea not only through theory, but my old friend Neil Turok is involved and he was the one who got me fired up about Hegel and dialectics. But they are NO LONGER PARALLEL.
The concept of parallel rests on Euclidean and Cartesian ideals, that I consider esoteric. Infinity, for example, the concept of never/always, is to my mind best visualised in the human mind as a loop.
PARALLEL UNIVERSES cannot COLLIDE.
Secondly the wonderful and for me intuitively beautiful idea that membranes are as turbulent as tsunami, well, the whole "parallel" universes and euclidean cartesian model has quietly been discarded now, so why have it at all? Then the idea of 11 Dimensions also evaporates, those dimensions presumed graph paper that is not in the bin.
Gaussian co-ordinate geometry released Einstein from Relativity version I - where he notoriously mentioned FIXED STARS (!!??!!) as the relative structure to put your fixed ruler over and over to measure strictly Cartesian dimensions. Relativity version II melted all the cartesian planes to mollusc or Salvador Dali geometry, with the famous results on gravity and ultimately balck holes.
There is a third version that Einstein never considered, I'll mention it in passing, it can also be Gaussian, but need not be. It is rotational geometry. The fixing of co-ordinates by rotation alone from an original position and a polar axis of apparent stillness.
Now my own work is based in rotation simply because a) rotation is everywhere apparent, truly all material forms rotate somehow from atoms to stars and we rotate on a planet surface that paradoxically is internally cognised as utterly and infinitely and eternally within a stage or screen of stillness. b) rotation makes so many dualities, it is a rich source of grounding for dialectics and makes recursive or fractal dialectics tangible and more easily explained.
I would be interested to see someone else devise Relativity III - using rotational geometry, and my feeling is the gaussian botch would no longer be necessary, the ideas of black holes and singularity would evolve to something very interesting and be seen from a whole new perspective. This would be very interesting work to see, pretty lousy to slog through and to it though, and ultimately, merely academic, I do think the questions today have moved on since the discovery that neutrinos have mass.
I have to say, concerning M Brane theory, which gets resolved only with 11 cartesian euclidean number friendly dimensions, and then the latest theories put flowing waves in the universe fabric and collide "parallel" universes - they are DIVERGENT and not PARALLEL
DIVERGENCE immediately raises the question of dimension in a new way. Divergence is rather like the splitting of a single cell into two, and it raises questions of an umbilical nature.
Let me explain this by analogy. I have cut two umbilical chords in my life, at the birth of my children. It feels rather like cutting through the rubber hose on a bunsen burner.
That act released my children to independent rotation. Otherwise they would be constrained like the dog on a leash or the telephone handset on a coiled cable.
So my interest focusses on rotation as the definition of separation. Separation is the fundamental idea beneath parallel AND divergence.
Now my son is nearly 19 and fleeing the nest - and my mother is really quite old now, and yet, there is some feeling that somehow those umbilical chords are still uncut. Some "dimension" or "realm" unseen and intangible seems intuitively to still "exist" where my son is directly linked to me, and I to my mother. No chain saw nor Kalashnikov can sever that link, and I am experimenting with actions to remove these repressions, for they restrict my movement and my son's movement. Basically I am doing an Ab Fan, acting like a teenager and my son and daughter have to grow up and be there for me in my adolescent confusions, which I failed to have back when.
What if all material forms, separated in our world of light and touch, remain connected by invisible umbilical linkages. Clearly human thought seeks these tramlines and leylines. Do we care that modern architecture is very much like Hitler's architecture. Not until you point out that link and then, suddenly, we adorn the building and fuss about distancing ourselves from the umbilical link to a Bad Man. Can I use the Hindu Swastika as if it had not Bad History? NO way. Clearly Human Thought is not mathematical but umbilical.
Life is clearly umbilical. Technically our DNA originally emerged from some sea slug or simple prehistoric lineage, and as a species we are strangely fascinated to know about all that. DNA RNA unzips - I must point out this is dualistic, left or right separations, the essence of Fractal Dialectics.
And so with wrongly labelled "parallel" universes. If they collide they are NOT parallel. Were they ever? That is the delusion of the concept of "dimension" - it presumes Cartesian Euclidean ideal that we finally discard like the training wheels on a child's bicycle.
If universes are DIVERGENT -ah - this is in fact the essence of Fractal Dialectic theory - the splitting finally recombines and that is a whole new area I call Juxtaposition Theory.
These Divergent Universes did not come from nowhere, that is conceptually esoteric. They resonated back together from originally being one. This is OSCILLATION!
This is sound.
There are harmonies
Now my range of discussion is beyond this part of the forum - the mathematics is better posted in the maths theorems section, and where can I post more about neutrinos and the significance that neutrions could actually be some second form of something like light that we do not yet have eyes to see beneath and into the structures of reality? |