This is an interesting conclusion quoted from above:
"This model proved extremely accurate, but it provided an intellectual stumbling block for theoreticians who did not understand where the quantization of energy arose — Planck himself only considered it "a purely formal assumption". This line of questioning helped lead to the formation of quantum mechanics."
Haven't we said that a quantum is the [intermitent] product of the mutual interference of two entangled waves as they propagate in the vacuum?
Its existence (quantum) depends in the actual state of the interference be that a constructive or destructive ones... Right?
Then wouldn't be logical to assume that as the "TWO-COIL-SYSTEM" shrinks or expands itself due to the particular STATE OF THAT PROCESS the actual POSITION of the "mass" and "charge" of the given quantum will also CHANGE with respect to space?
So! It wouldn't be ilogical to understand that there are in fact some variables that could influence the outcome of such PREDICTION would be?
If the inherent energy of the two entangled waves are higher or lower the whole "COIL STRUCTURE" will be forced to "respond" to it in a sort of "STANDARD DEVIATION" manner I would say...
THEREFORE if two electrons were MADE (scatterred) from two different "energetic entanglements" (actual physical atomic orbits) wouldn't be too difficult to assume that their relative structure had to be somewhat different too... right?
This could make pretty complicated the entire calculation procedure I guess... So manny uncertainties to handle at one time...(?)
I guess the easier shortcut was to renomalize the entire mathematical formulation and case closed!
What do you really think? Could our "SPIRAL MODEL" be of some help to reconsider once again Dirac's "reduced h" ?
Do you think you could do by yourselves?
HUMANBYDEFAULT