[humanbydefault]

A holistic model of the atom is the only viable way to explain the mechanism behind the nature of a quantum entanglement between atoms>>> something we know as molecular bond. To get the right idea I'd ask you to consider the conclusions of my thought experiment back in special relativity posting. Two spheres with different radious serving as the path to a light beam made to move in circles around both of them. A logical conclusion to such hypothetical case could only be the presence of an increasing "LAG" as time elapsed due to the difference between the propagation of light in one circle with respect to the other. The case is not that hypothetical at all. It is precisely the structure assumed to spin around the core of the atom a similar phenomenon where a logical lag has been interpreted as relativity of space-time. Instead of the light beam of my thought experiment the atom is the "backbone" for a harmonic structure of energies (standing nuclear waves).

A chemical bond is a typical example of a NON-LINEAR coupling of orbits. The nature of the non-linearity includes space-time and the actual configuration of energies (its own scale responding to Pauli's Exclusion Principle).
Let's explain one by one:
1>>> What would happen if you try to put closer together two positive poles of two magnet?
The rejection will get stronger with the shrinking of the distance. A sort of a response with an inverse square of the (approaching) distance. The same picture but showing attraction will be to put two magnets facing opposite magnetic poles. This is a fact I suppose.
A chemical bond is just this. Two atomic orbits (harmonics) linked into an entangled spinning orbit "looking for" a net ENERGETIC COMPENSATION of the given orbit.
The problem arises with the FACT that the actual bond or link is only "perfect" at DISCONTINUED [intermitent] LAPSES OF TIME. To understand this point (which is not too abstract at all as you'll see) you need to visualize the actual non-linearity at which the entangled-spinning orbits belonging to each atom produce the bond. Go back to the "Two-circle-experiment" of mine for a second. Put those two circles one beside the other barely touching one another by a common point in the orbit. There has to be a RECURRENT INSTANT IN TIME where the magnetic interaction of both orbits are in perfect balance >>> a negative pole and a positive one close to each other. But as time goes on the NON-LINEAR speed of one orbit with respect to the other will increase*, reaching its maximum LAG [the point of maximum instability of the bond] to finally resuming the cycle with the initial state of equilibrium.
THIS PEFECTLY LOGICAL FEATURE OF EVERY EXISTENT CHEMICAL BOND BETWEEN ATOMS IN MOLECULES IS THE ONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE OBSERVED VIBRATION OF ATOMS IN LATTICES OF SOLIDS, LIQUIDS AND GASES.
Bonds are conceived to reach a perfect magnetic balance between two atoms with place for enegy in their missing harmonics but the same REASON that conditiones their bond, namely the attraction between two complementing orbits (positive pole with negative pole) is the same reason that makes them so unstable together (!)
That's why atoms bond each other with incomplete harmonics. The actual distance between the core of the atom and its harmonic taking part in a bond (radius) has to be different in order to create the space-time effect I explained to you with my thought experiment in the past.
THIS COUPLING BETWEEN ORBITS WITH AN INHERENT "TIME LAG" MANIFESTED BY THE ENERGY CHANGING SPINNING POLARITY IN A NON-LINEAR CONFIGURATION IS ALSO THE SOURCE FOR THE PHYSICAL PHENOMENON KNOWN AS "ATOMIC OSCILLATOR" (!)

IT IS DURING THE EXACT PERIOD OF TIME WHERE A "POLARITY-INSTABILITY" OR IMBALANCE IS PRESENT INSIDE THE STRUCTURE OF THE BOND WHEN THE MOLECULE IS READY TO ACCEPT INCOMING EXTERNAL ENERGY TO PUT UP WITH THE MIS-ALIGNEMENT CREATED BY THE "LAG." (!)

Light or any other type of electromagnetic energy is actually pulled inside the molecular bond to account for the imbalance caused by the "LAG" BETWEEN THE ORBITS (HARMONICS) MAKING for the chemical bond >>> getting REMODULATED or TRANSFORMED inside the "micro-singularity" into a new type of quantum.

IT IS PRECISELY THIS FEATURE WHAT EXPLAINS WHY SOME ATOMIC STRUCTURES PRESENT A DIFERRENT PATTERN OF DELAY** AND BEHAVE WITHOUT A UNIQUE RULE WHEN IT COMES TO SCATTERRING ENERGY BACK INTO THE VACUUM.
It is thought that electrons (previously excited) inside atoms "take their time" to "jump down" in the ladder sometimes skiping one or more rungs in it. The truth is that no one has ever come up with a logical explanation to such weird feature of atomic scatterrings.
We could also explain under my assumptions the stubborness showed by atoms when it comes to accept inside them only certain "chunks" of energy and not any quantum we would like them to absorb. The reason as I see it comes from the length of the instability (intermitently) present in every single coupling at molecular levels. If the magnetic balance between atoms were optimally reached [at all times] then it wouldn't be any chance for abpsortion of any kind and therefore light wouldn't even exist in the first place (!)

*The difference of the two atomic radius involved in the chemical bond is simulateously responsible for the enegetic instability occuring as time elapses. If you like... This recurrent process could be seen as a race where one car is moving at twice the speed of the next spinning in the circle. The actual distance separating one from the other will uniformely increase and as it reaches the maximum value the instability will starting to decrease to zero... Omly those two "cars" are moving at light speed (!)
** The actual delay is proportional to the non-linearity involved in the mutual spin. In other words... Absorbed external energy will stay inside the bond until the magnetic balance is ultimately reached once again. Not before that moment any eventual scatterring of remodulated enegy has no chances to occur at all.
I'd like to hear the opinion of those who have read my thread.

HUMANBYDEFAULT