Theory of Everything - View Single Post

AntonioLao · **multitasking -** 05-09-2006, 01:13 PM

In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles.

It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation.

	(#1 (permalink))
AntonioLao Raider of the lost time Status: Offline Posts: 5,613 Thanks Given: 790 Thanked 180x in 174 Posts Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80	multitasking - 05-09-2006, 01:13 PM In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles. It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²