Thread
:
simple is not
View Single Post
Re: simple is not
(#
7
(
permalink
))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
Status:
Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power
: 80
Re: simple is not -
05-11-2006, 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
GUILLE
How are you trying to do that?
By making an assumption that the orthogonal forces exist only at the local infinitesimal region of space-time.
Time independence:
[∂
E(
g)
]²=[∂
F
(
a
)
×∂
r
(
a
)
]
·
[∂
F
(
b
)
×∂
r
(
b
)
] and Mass independence:
¶
a
(
t
)·
¶
r
(
t
)=
c
²
AntonioLao
View Public Profile
Send a private message to AntonioLao
Find More Posts by AntonioLao