Thread: simple is not
View Single Post
Re: simple is not
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
AntonioLao
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: simple is not - 05-12-2006, 12:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by hanzoganz
For simplicity, i would recommend reading A new kind of science, by Wolfram.
Thanks for your recommendation. I have a copy of his book right in front of me as I type these texts. Looking through I noticed that there are loads of fractal computer designs but very little physics. Chapter 12 did mentioned his justifications for a connection to reality as a computational equivalence.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Reply With Quote