Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · **Re: Chain Of Events -** 05-17-2006, 01:30 PM

Mohan,,

Preciselly Fukuyama's theory of the end of history comes from that idea. That history is simply the progress, and progress, as what it classically means, has dissapeared. There is no unidirectional advance.

I doubt that axioms are the link of cause and effect. It is hard to understand that definition, can you explain it, or give examples? An axiom is a start, not a virtual (temporal) form, it is just static, agains the logic of change, of chain of events of which speak.

Also, the philosophy of events isn't very clear. Becuase we could jsutify that (ex) I kill someone and I shall not pay for it because something caused that effect. I mean, by this, that the philosophy of event (well, not all of them, but yours definatelly) ignores the idea of subjects and entities acting and interacting.

	(#2 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48	Re: Chain Of Events - 05-17-2006, 01:30 PM Mohan,, Preciselly Fukuyama's theory of the end of history comes from that idea. That history is simply the progress, and progress, as what it classically means, has dissapeared. There is no unidirectional advance. I doubt that axioms are the link of cause and effect. It is hard to understand that definition, can you explain it, or give examples? An axiom is a start, not a virtual (temporal) form, it is just static, agains the logic of change, of chain of events of which speak. Also, the philosophy of events isn't very clear. Becuase we could jsutify that (ex) I kill someone and I shall not pay for it because something caused that effect. I mean, by this, that the philosophy of event (well, not all of them, but yours definatelly) ignores the idea of subjects and entities acting and interacting.