Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie Guille and Mohan, I think that natural logic is both intuitional and instinctual, much more than principled, and herein lies the problem. The modern world must look carefully and deeply at the many forms and definitions of logic to truly determine what the meanings really are. Realize, we have every type from Aristotle's principled logic to Brouer's intuitionistic logic, plus some one hundred thirty-five others___and then there's also psychologic and music logic... We make most mistakes of interpretation on this one issue alone___this must change...
regards |
I was searching on the internet when I came along this interview to Micahel Hardt:
http://www.theminnesotareview.org/ns61/hardt.htm he isn't a postmodern thinker totally, but his main idea is joining marxism and poststructuralism. In a part of the interview he says that there he has no problems with contradictions in the world, just as I do. For example, there are two types of loves (he says): the passive and the active one, one which doesn't act and is influenced from external forms and another one which is isolated. He says they are two manifestations of the same love, and that happen in all loves (when one is there, the other too). Also, he says that the proletarian is 'wthin but against' capitalism. He explains that the proletarian is part of capitalism, and pushes it to it's limit, to thinks which are not dealing with market and production, to covering wills and liberties etz, that is, to pull capitalism out of itself. So within and against is another contradiction but true. We can say that this is the logic of contradiction, and that it is the only logic of logics; the logic about logics, not like the others which are logics about something else (math, music, science, mind...), as if logic always tried to escape from itself.