Welcome to the forum Joseph. It's good to have another logically clear thinker on board. I think you have offered a great addition to our thought processes, especially as relates to these statements; "The mechanical conscience of the universe" and your universal law "The wave energy of the universe is constantly seeking ever more stable states of equilibrium." I am a big fan of the equilibriated states of all universal processes, and have been working in this area for over 25 years, and also the area of trying to define Hofstadter's statement; "How does inanimate matter produce animate beings?" You are one who has offered the mechanical idea I wrote about as far back as the `80's, and since I am basicly an economist using physics' laws, maths and logics to prove economic models, the equilibrium law is truly amazing. I also, over the last two years, had realized the importance of the two definitions of time being required to explain reality properly, although not exactly as you have used the two time states. Your's is a welcome addition. Mine was a philosophical point, that reality could not be truly comprehended without a separate infinite now time space, to witness the real world of wave/matter motions and all physical reality from___the super-objective point of view___which just happens to come from the super-subjective awareness.
Anyway, thanks for the input, welcome again, and keep up the great work. I find nothing in your thesis I outright disagree with, however check out Milo Wolff's work,
http://www.quantummatter.com/ if you haven't already, to see how close your ideas are. I'd like to hear your opinion about his ideas as relates to yours...
regards,
Lloyd
p.s.
I already like your idea about "The mechanical conscience of the universe" better than Milo Wolff's idea of wave/particle communication. It's logically more sound...