Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WithoutMe A "Theory" exists in relation to a Phenomenon.
Noumenon cannot have a theory, the noumenon, if is, simply is... a theory meaning the relationships of it in terms of Causality; & noumenon, if is, doesnt have any sort of causality to it, buit its not random either, coz it is not antri-causal, it si simply deviod of all such connections, coz to start with, there r no divisions of cause & effect..... there (if is) what is the cause, is the effect... infact it is an illusion to think or take the Noumenon in terms of cause & effect.... a noumenon cannot have a theory.... Kant shud have met me before writing such a fat book...hehehehe!
Regards,
wM. |
I agree with you. But science accepted this, it dedicated to phenomena and cause-effect but has failed. Why? Because for the last century, things were so complicated, and going in such a circular exact way, that it needed to start being based on uncertainty. Not only physics, but all science. Probability and statistics govern science now. That means the exact circular explanations of cause-effect relation has failed. How to do science from now on? Are we condemned to keeping this probability-statistics terrible duality for ever and ever? I hope not.