| | |
| The Observer
Status: Online Posts: 1,896
Thanks Given: 38
Thanked 232x in 182 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 37 | Re: beginning of universe -
06-29-2006, 03:52 PM
Sinjin;
Your questions probably require a much more longwinded explanation, but here’s a short version. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sinjin So if the universe is moving towards lower entropy, will it eventually reach zero entropy? And if so, would this be the one directional vector you're talking about, or would there be no directional vector at zero entropy? |
Zero entropy infers a state of zero degree of freedom. I view motion of matter as an absolute and thus conserved. This is just another way of saying “conservation of energy”. Any quantity of matter that is in a state of unity motion or one direction of motion will condense to a perfect solid and will appear to have infinite density and mass according to our current mathematics. Quote: |
Originally Posted by Sinjin What is this last degree of freedom you mention? Are you attributing this "one directional vector of motion" to a final state the universe will obtain? If so, could this final state be a heat death? Or, conversely, could it be a state of maximum energy? | The universe is expanding due to an event that caused the unity motion to be redistributed in many directions of degree of freedom. This is primarily the vibrations of matter as in the expansion and condensing or wave function of matter. If the universe is truly an open universe, then the matter that condenses to particle structures will form fragments such as supper dense black holes with both linear and angular momentum and thus their entropy will stop at that point.
As far as a state of maximum energy is concerned, it should be noted that energy is conserved due to the fact that motion is conserved. Matter that condenses to its minimum level of entropy will be in a state of maximum “Potential Energy”.
These are only my conclusion of the observational data and may not fully correspond to current accepted science text. I don’t agree with the Big Bang scenario. David |
|
| |