| Re: photon vs photon Guille,
I don't accept big bang and inflationary theories, nor any illusory concepts of time and space for an absolute state. It is not only absurd, to imagine there is a Universe contained by a place that doesn't exist, but is impossible for the same reason.
Yeah, I would equate gravity with mass and/or energy. Both gravity and energy are proportionate/relative to mass. If we think outside of the Newtonian and Einsteinian box of rest-mass concepts and consider all mass to be relativistic, we can directly link gravity to electromagnetism and the strong force. The more massive the object, the more "rest" energy it has, and this is exactly proportionate to Gc^2.
Further, in an infinite Universe, any and every point any and everywhere is the centre of the Universe. Taking a step to the left or right doesn't take you a step closer to the edge of an infinite Universe, and reducing Planck's constant increases Einstein's constant accordingly. So reducing h to zero makes c infinite, in a true vacuum; and at this point, any virtual particles will contain infinite energy/mass for which forms the basis for all temporal quantum interactions. |