Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nobody I don't accept big bang and inflationary theories, nor any illusory concepts of time and space for an absolute state. It is not only absurd, to imagine there is a Universe contained by a place that doesn't exist, but is impossible for the same reason. |
A dimension is absolute by definition (dimension is a scale to measure, and a scale to measure must be constant, and if it is a neccesary scale to measure (like space-time), it is absolute). You don't give any reason why it is absurd, nor why you call 'any illusory concepts' to my logical and empirical view of space and time.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nobody Yeah, I would equate gravity with mass and/or energy. Both gravity and energy are proportionate/relative to mass. If we think outside of the Newtonian and Einsteinian box of rest-mass concepts and consider all mass to be relativistic, we can directly link gravity to electromagnetism and the strong force. The more massive the object, the more "rest" energy it has, and this is exactly proportionate to Gc^2. |
Energy is relative or proportionate to mass? I don't think so. Mass is a type of energy just as any other. And the ammount of a type of energy determines the values of the other energies in their aspects. If an object has certain mass it will gain certain kinetic energy if impulsed by any force. But that doesn't makeall energy be relative to mass. All energy is relative to all energy, as all totalities are relative to it's parts (and this is now a metaphysical law, not only limitted to the physical world). And I remember you that you are equation a force with an energy, which are very very different concepts (or 'entities). Energy is a force at a distance, therefore in your universe there is no distance, therefore no space, and therefore it is a singularity.