[Nobody]

First, don’t get me wrong, Guille, I’m not implying there is anything wrong with your logic or the logic of science when it pertains to relativity or empirical effects. I only suggest returning to first philosophy to answer what is outside the Universe instead of focusing on increasingly more complex notions of the workings within the Universe based on the increase of new observations. For me, the former has shed quite a bit of light on some of the empirical evidence found through photonic experiments.

The SLAC experiment I included in the theory of nothing thread tells me that photonic interactions are directly related to the creation of fermions. I conclude that energy is proportionate to mass based on the fact that massless carriers transmit the difference between the measurement of massive particles prior to and after interactions. That the energy stored in massive objects is directly responsible for and proportionate to the gravitational force.

Newtonian and Einsteinian physics don’t account for the relationship between gravity and electromagnetism at the quantum level, whereby large-scale gravity and electromagnetism can be equated to the strong and weak forces. They are all essentially the same force functioning in different ways at different scales. Gravity is considered weakest because its carrier has to travel a much greater distance - the greater the distance, the weaker the effect; but in reality, the disproportionate force is responsible for holding particles together at the quantum level.

As for dimensions being absolute, I could only consider them relatively absolute because they seem to be relative to an observer making a measurement. They can’t be considered absolute in and of themselves, and are also dependant upon each other in order to exist. So, I say illusory because I view all movement through "space/time" as incremental replications of various concentrations of infinite mass over an infinite number of non-dimensional points. All of which are in their own right absolute and can be considered the centre of the Universe - all movement is relative to illusory concepts of time based on one point being differentiated from other points which only gives a "sense" of motion. Literal motion is impossible because there is no literal place to go to.