[becomingagodo]

after looking in the internet for the smartest person whoever lived i came across him william sidis iq 250-300 could correct harvard professor mathmatics at 7. well william sidis in his book inanimate and animate describe the origins of the universe as always exsisted and successfully describe what is a animate being opposed to an object.
the main theortical evidance against the eternal univers is that if their infinte stars burning for an infinite amount of time then the sky must be infintly bright the alder paradox however william sidis proposed that matter following the rule of second law of thermodynamics i.e. that push a bottle of a ledge it will smash is highly unlikely that the smashed bottle will jump and reform into a normal bottle making this law itself paradox then he argue that matter follow these to extreme. now he argue that the propertise of this matter is that will absorbed light and not admit it and that we cannot directly see it but we my have some other form of evidance i.e. gravity now what does this seem like dark matter he predicted dark matter 80 years before being observed also he anwser the arrow of time paradox by saying that to an observer a bottle smashing is more plausible then a bottle repairing itself and that this fact means that time does not go in one direction it just that we go with the second law of thermodynamics time itself does not act like any other dimension.
so from this you have to be a idiot to still believe in a big bang. big bang make little to no theortical and observation fact. theortical what was before the big bang nothing. nothing itself is very big paradox which i wont describe here but this fact destroy nearly every rule of physics. to end i will leave you with food for thought we live in a infinte universe where nothing is impossible and P.A.M Direc once said that the law of quantum mechaincs exsist or nothing exsist.