[r.p.bibra]

our 'intelligence'---as we assess---is the essence of two types of knowledge:knowledge (data/information) of ephemeral world& that relating to 'Reality'. knowledge of the former is easily and also verifiable, hence any argumentation on this account is futile& foolish. as about the second subject there is an unending disputation,because of the monopoly of the religions for being the sole 'agent' or the 'link' between the seeker& the seekth.but to our misfortune, all religions have different 'perceptions' about the 'reality', not any two agree on any fundamental or even basic issues concerning It. in the worldly knowledge, if some scientists differ on some issues, their differences are supported with theories/formulas/models and the day comes when all their available knowledge is pooled& a new discovery is made. so amongst the experts there can be difference of opinion but as soon an irrefutable model is translated into an invention/discovery, all are happy. problem lies with pseudo intellectuals---ignoramuses, who due to their half-baked ideas try to pollute the inspiring brains. if the raving& renting of such elements along with the religionist fundamentalists are ignored, there won't be any wrong or right, as all genuine seekers are for more and more knowledge, from which ever source it comes. little-self.