View Single Post
Re: Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
dleviwing
The Observer
dleviwing is a glorious beacon of lightdleviwing is a glorious beacon of light
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,811
Thanks Given: 26
Thanked 184x in 149 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 36
   
Re: Philosphical TOE (draft notes) - 09-25-2006, 03:04 PM

Hi Jamish;
Welcome to ToeQuest. I copied your 2 posts to my word processor to read latter. It translates to 17 pages of text. I hope your future posts are not as extensive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamish
If you are not a philosophical thinker, but a scholarly type who adheres to what science preaches then you won't get anything much out of it. Still I'd be awfully surprised if there were not at least one thing that grabs your imagination.
Sorry but I am one of those type that follow the objectives of science. The philosophical thinking part of science is called “Theoretical Physics”. In this sense I agree with you that we need better science paradigms or theories. I do however feel you have not paid your dues or earned the right to make such a statement. Science is based on the process of experimentation to attempt to provide evidences to support the “Philosophical Thinkers” who believe science is performed with a pencel.
From what I’ve read so far, you’ve done a good job of thinking.


David
  
Reply With Quote