Thread: Big Bang?
View Single Post
Re: Big Bang?
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
protheory
Blue Belt
protheory is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Thanks Given: 27
Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2006
Rep Power: 9
   
Re: Big Bang? - 09-27-2006, 07:40 AM

Hi everybody, this is what I think about the Big Bang model of the universe.

This quote is just to show my general ideas about this, and thanks to everyone that has posted before me, this is an extremely informative thread

Quote:
The Big Bang

Introduction
This theory describes the supposed creation of the whole universe.

We have not yet managed to prove whether or not there was actually a beginning to the universe, nor have we proved if there will eventually be an end.

Singular
The big bang is a model of everything that imagines a singular point in time when the universe began.

Distant
It suggests that at some point in the extremely distant past, all the matter and energy in what we now know as the universe was once concentrated into an unimaginably dense state.

Original
This original state is usually described as a singularity.

Contract
According to this model, at some relative time in the future the universe will eventually contract back into the dense nothingness from which it came.

Return
It will return to an original and singular state.

Crunch
This idea is known as the "big crunch."

Expanding
It is currently accepted by many that the universe is still expanding from this original singularity.

Cosmic
Cosmic background radiation implies that we can still detect radiation travelling through the universe from the same event, even though it supposedly happened countless millions of years ago.

Emanating
Red light emanating from distant galaxies implies that they are moving away from us and blue light implies the opposite.

Shifted
Red shifted light has been observed and this eventually lead to the idea that the universe seems to be expanding, or at least moving away from our relative point of reference at the current moment.

Summary
Is the universe currently expanding from an original singularity?

Is there a definite and singular beginning and end to the universe?

The Problem
Did some sort of massive explosion create the universe?

The Answer

Energy
All energy (everything) is not unchangingly "created" or "destroyed" it is changed.

Whole
The universe as a relative whole is change and as such a more accurate definition cannot be achieved.

Observable
You might say that change is the only observable property of the universe that doesn't change, so to speak.

Expanding
The universe may currently appear to be expanding but this is a relative observation that is subject to change of three types in three ways simultaneously.

Relative
Even if the universe seems to be moving away from us we must not forget that our earthly view is ultimately relative.

Unchangeable
There is no singular and unchangeable start or finish to our universe, there is change of three potentials, at all relative times.

Did a "big bang" create the universe?
1. A big bang created the universe.
2. A big bang did not create the universe.
3. There is a neutral possibility.

Simultaneously.

Am I wrong?
I simultaneously oppose, agree with, and neutralise all criticism ad infinitum.

My point is literal.

There is no point creating a theory of everything that doesn't work.
I've directly quoted this text from my home page www.protheory.com to get the discussion started about the idea of a "big bang" creating the universe and therefore "everything."

What do you guys think about my three simultaneous potentials idea?


All we need to do is search for falsity.

www.protheory.com

www.youtube.com/protheory
  
Reply With Quote