[Tony Stanton]

I agree there is no point in creating a theory that doesn’t work. Any theory of this Universe should be mathematically testable and if it is correct then it should never break down at the extremes of this universe. Unfortunately General Relativity and all other well known theories do break down at the extremes, especially at the Big Bang.
Mathematically True Relativity does not break down at the Big Bang or inside black holes but the physics community still ignores it, why?
The reason is simple. It is because the physics they have all been taught will need to be completely revised. They all will have to dump their so called knowledge because it does not agree with what they believe to be true.
The majority of the science community are hard working and creative but the way our science is structured means innovation is stifled because even if experimental evidence shows some anomaly against known physics, it gets the cold shoulder by the establishment.
I will take the example of the Irish company who came up with a way of generating power using only magnetic fields. Apparently the technology works and the scientists who tested it agreed that it works, in private, but refused to go on record because the result of gaining energy from nothing goes against known physics and they are frightened of being shunned by their peers. This is no way to conduct science in general. If the results show that energy can be created this way then there is a reason why? A true scientist would want to find out the reason. You can’t just dismiss the experimental evidence because the results shatter your belief in known physics and you are frightened of upsetting your peers.
I know this happens because many registered physicists have read True Relativity but are unwilling to comment on it, let alone actually test it. Why? Is it because all their fundamental beliefs will be shattered or the fact, in accepting True Relativity, they will be shunned and ridiculed by their peers? It’s sad to see science done this way.