Quote:
| AntonioLao .. The big bang is caused by the equality of spacetime. This is a state of perfect symmetry. Once this is broken the effect is nothing more than the birth of the contact universe.
|
Quote:
| Zeroca ..Had nothing any capability to give rise to universe? I think it had.
|
Quote:
MKirkPatrick ...The primary cause of the "big bang" was the arising of a thought from absolute unity,
and exiting the eternal equilibrium
|
The first quote gives no reason, (and I don't believe a reason is necessary ) for the birth of the contact universe, but seems to hint that it is an illusion, at a deeper level symmetry still exists. But to me the word symmetry implies .. more than one state .. that is, to have balance there must be two equal and opposite forces.
The second quote implies a single 'nothing' that spilt into two opposite parts in order to obey 'main regularity' ..Zeroca .. you seem to imply that a split was a probablity ... a low probability but nevertheless a probability and that all probabilities eventually occur.
The third quote is similar to the first and second, and into 'absolute unity' a ripple, so so small, began a journey.
'Perfect Symmetry' .. 'Absolute Unity' .. 'Main Regularity' ... I read these as similar terms ...
We take the term 'Nothing' to mean nothing at all. But maybe there is no such thing and never was.
What if, to create a nothing, you empty everything out (this takes energy applied from the outside)... and then you reach a point where there is an amount of energy left ... but in order to remove this energy and achieve your goal.. you have to put more energy in and thereby you contaminate the nothing. You are in a 'Catch 22' situation.
Maybe all 'Nothing' has this problem. Maybe this is the true definition of 'Nothing' and always was ?? At any point this 'meta' energy could be released for any of the reasons quoted above ... or no reason at all. And the birth of the 'Contact Universe' occurs. ???
Just speculation .. greg
