Quote:
Originally Posted by Benedict Broere  Apparently I can, and I have arguments to back it up.
Here's the adress for further explanation: http://aosbenm.nl/
The nature of reality is certainly not just a choice of the mind. Contrary to that, it's the nature of a certain mind that shows reality in a certain light. |
Einstein thought that way too___he's dead___and so was the universe at origin. Are you aware of the M theories of universes? One, by AI nuts, proposes another universe possible of pure computer computations and absolutely fake humanoids. The way most meta-thinkers think ___without defining truth to start with___I think the fake humanoids have already arrived...no offense...
I see on your web site you mention something universal, connecting everything, yet you are against motion. Here's one for ya; "All quantum/relative motion is identical to classical thermodynamic motion and entropy." Think about it, they work identically___just take thermo-hydro-dynamics up to the velocity of light, as the mass theory of relative motion, and it's easily seen. Even Hawking has discovered this. So, let's start over again, and re-define it all___and I mean all...
Just finished reading your entire site about aos. Analyses, Omega, Synthesis or syntheticism. Benedict, I too long ago thought and wrote very similar to your thinking. You can check it out at my blog, macromouse, at least the notes are still there. I was very optimistic when I had developed an economic worldview, also aided by P.T.DeChardan. I was going to set the world on fire. Like you I also realized, with all my studies, as I am also a polymath autodidact, that it may take many years, as you and I are well aware of the slow pace of real world changes. However, after trying to get my ideas accepted by a large audience, I realized I was not going to succeed, in the field of economics and culture, from the meta-scientist's perspective. The only reason I'm here at toequest is to find the big idea, to sell the ideas that are more in line with my and your thinking about omega, as I wrote an entire chapter about Pierre and the Noosphere Omega Point, to no avail, of course. I think you have mentioned most of the reasons true thoughts will no longer be accepted by society, and I came to that conclusion a few years ago. So, here we both are at toequest___I in search for the big science idea to sell economics and cultural improvement, and You?
Now, not to be rude, but as far as meta-physical opinions reaching or changing the world___I simply ask how? The other side has all the money, law and corruption. How can meta-sciences change corruption when it is owned by the materialist scientific holders of money? Corruption of this magnitude buys its own progress, any style it chooses___chooses___money is choice... It will take big scientific ideas to change this sad state of affairs. The
big idea of change will have to be bigger than Einstein's. So, there you have it___I choose science to accomplish your goals... Meta-science has already failed me___I will never return... I will
scientifically arrive, at meta-physical change, into the magic omega point...
regards,