[Benedict Broere]

Thanks Lloyd for taking the trouble to read my website and give your respons.
It’s a bit bitter isn’t it, what you write? Because you write you had something similar at hand, but was very disappointed about the reponse it generated. Well may be my fate is the same: scratching at a huge concrete wall and just being ignored. You see this worldview ‘naturalism’ is a kind of faith these days, that seem to block all thinking about the phenomenon ‘worldview’ in general. And especially when people see the word ‘creativity’ used in an ontological sense, they seem to think: God, means Dark Ages, means bunkers (crazy). And this while I’m just saying: THESE are the scientific data I use, and THIS is the general pattern I see in them.

‘Naturalism’ isn’t of course a scientific proven fact. It is just one of the many ways to interpret the scientific data. Subsequently it becomes interesting to find out what is behind all the different ways the world is interpreted. Hence looking at, as I do, neurology, psychology, sociology, antropology and history. What results in noticing a significant pattern in the general shift, mentally, in society and in worldview, all the way from the hunter-gatherer to contemporary man. A pattern that can be linked to an essential pattern that seems to organise the world itself, starting with mathematics, etcetera – see my website.

You also have some technical remarks about ‘thermodynamics’ and ‘motion’.

First ‘motion’. It wouldn’t be taken in view. But I speak of parts becoming wholes and wholes becoming parts. In respect to a universe that’s a lot of motion. Also I speak of direction. Then I use this word ‘omega’, as a concept of quality and aim. So it’s there: motion, direction.

‘Thermodynamics’. Things become and decay. Within my definition ‘become’ can be associeted with ‘synthesis’, while ‘decay’ can be associated with ‘analysis’.

It is may be confusing, but I use these terms analysis, omega and synthesis in a new way. I looked for words to use, and came up with these because of their traditional content. But I use them differently.

About the possibility of all these universa… This one to me is quite enough to consider.

Do I want to change things?
Power corrupts and absolute power…
I’m just looking for answers. What is going on on this planet? Why do we think what we think? Why do we do what we do? What is the meaning of all this? What is the general pattern that connects, in all what is going on, and in all our thinking and doing and searching for meaning?

If truth is bought by power, then we really are in trouble.

Regards.