| Re: Consistency & Completeness -
10-24-2006, 12:41 PM
A true knowledge, identical with an object is impossible. An object is defined by observation (self observation included). For how would the object exist if no one (including the object itself) is there to identify it. What would the world look like if you have no senses at all, no touch, no smell, no sight, no hearing, no taste. How would the world communicate with you and how would you perceive this world. Where would this true knowledge come from and if it existed what would the meaning be, if as mentioned afore, no one is there to absorb it, including the object itself.
Therein lays the inconsistency for completeness "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both"
Benjamin Franklin |