| | |
| The Observer
Status: Offline Posts: 1,728
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 129x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 33 | Re:Universal Evolution -
11-09-2006, 11:50 AM
Hi Lloyd; Sounds like a good start. Rather than “invitation only”, let’s just say that all posts not relevant to the pure science theme will be removed. I have seen too many good science threads destroyed by creationist infiltration and pure nonsense. Let’s start with everyone posting in this thread must submit their scenario of the initial event, adopt another members, or use the standard model Big Bang. You may also start before the event if you wish. Quote: THE STANDARD MODEL: The standard model describes our universe as having expanded from a “singularity”; a point-like region of space (or in space) that was supersaturated with energy that formed an ultra-hot ultra-dense medium in which the gravity was so strong that it curved space back on itself in a distance of about 10^-36 cm. As the universe became larger it cooled from its ultra-dense ultra-hot origins. The fundamental interactions sorted themselves out into the strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces. The resulting mixed soup of matter, neutrinos, and radiation, cooled and separated, and the components went their separate ways. The radiation component, we still see today as the cosmic microwave background. The matter congealed into dust clumps that became galaxies. Stars formed, exploded in supernova violence, and formed again, repeatedly recycling matter into heavier elements. The result is what we call the Big Bang even though it is really a Big Swelling. | To clarify this inflation model further, we must also accept the notion that nothing existed prior to this event. By nothing, science means that there was not a place for the universe to expand into. No empty void and no existence of any kind. As a realist, I have a problem with this something from absolute nothing scenario. The Standard Model as it stands, may just as well start with the words "Let there be light". This model is another form of the Genesis philosophy. THE WINGIT MODEL: The Wingit scenario starts by saying that fundamental substance of the universe was concentrated in units of enormous quantities. These units may have been whizzing through the cosmic void with absolute linear motion (2x10^20 m/s) in all different directions. By some remote chance, two of these units where on a collision course ordained to create a remarkable existence from this single substance. In this scenario there is no need to comprehend entities of energy, forces, antimatter, or gravity, to explain the existence of stars, planets, and galaxies, only an understanding of the basic properties of the fundamental substance that is about to collide. These properties are primarily, “Self-affinity” (bonding) and “Absolute Motion”. These units of matter had these properties before this event and all the material systems formed from these units will have these properties after the event. This scenario infers that a place and a substance has always existed and thus no real beginning. Total uniform motion of this entity is like saying it is total kinetic energy and thus only one degree of freedom – absolute zero temperature. The collision converts the uniform linear motion to chaotic vibrations to maximum temperature and entropy. With a little tweaking of the standard model, the rest is history. WHO’S NEXT? David
Last edited by dleviwing : 11-11-2006 at 05:34 PM.
|
|
| |