View Single Post
Re: Universal Evolution
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
dleviwing
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,732
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: Universal Evolution - 11-12-2006, 03:32 PM

Ok Lloyd, let’s say you set up your axioms for your concept and we can compare similarities and differences latter for discussion. Also before we get into the formalisms of thermodynamics, Relativity, and QED, let’s establish a functional paradigm to interpret the numbers produced by these theories.

In my concept, (actually called "Toronics") we have not as yet entered the wave phenomena phase of the evolving universe basically because it has not yet started evolving. We are only at the phase of defining the fundamental substance we’re going to use to make a universe as we know it today. To do this, we must assign or define the fundamental properties that this substance has or can produce. In your case, you are using terms like “force” which I find highly objectionable at this phase. Force is a term that infers physical behavior and motion; So in my concept, I simply state that this substance has a fundamental property of motion. This property must be absolute (fixed quantity in all systems).

Now we have the grounds for the 4th axiom and second property of fundamental matter.
Axiom 4: Matter has “Absolute Motion”. Any autonomous system formed by matter must have the equivalent of this quantity without exception.

The next step is to show how motion can be distributed within a system and what effect it has on the bonding property and interactions of the system.

Is there anything else we need to produce a universe?


David
  
Reply With Quote