[zeroca]

Dear Tony!

---I’m not scientist, and I rarely read other people’s theories, especially those of scientists’, because I think that in the process of concentration on a certain, particular theme they loose principal, i.e. developing intellectually they blunt the intuition. And I also don’t care what great physicists assert (so should you), because it will either be true or false; also English isn’t my native language, I speak it not very well, I don’t understand clearly all your formulas, and I’m not sure that I saw your site correctly, but at least I looked through and read it.
---I found your theory somehow similar to mine, concerning the part where all bodies generate their own space-time, but you, as I guessed consider body as a complete, rigid event, but I consider it a process, opposite to its adjacent space, which also is a process (i.e. they both happen “within” time).
---I also agree that the rate of space (i.e. radius of sphere), generated by object is directly proportional to mass of the object (If you mean that), but I don’t think that any part of universe can be at rest. I believe that you used this term figuratively.
---And I think that not only space-time, but also body-time is 4-dimentional, but the difference between them is that body-time always occupies the central part (radially) of generated space, but space-time - peripheral part (radially).
---And I think you missed, or maybe haven’t prepared yet the analysys, how space-times are summed up/decomposed when their objects are summed up/decomposed, (particularly in cases of planets and also in cases of objects, placed within and outside of space-times of planets).
So you should produce your perfect “visual example” of glass paperweight within the space-time of the Earth and just outside it as well, i.e. outside of space-time of any planet (i.e. at rest), I’d like to say that the space-time of whole universe can be divided only into space-times of heavenly bodies, and all the rest little bodies, placed within the space-times of heavenly bodies have different behavior (their space-times are summed up with the space-time of heavenly body at once, radially, peripherally and just that’s the reason for striving of object to the planet’s body radially, centrally. I think you should produce your own view of it.
---I haven’t concentrated on the subject of light travel speed since my school time and don’t want to “spoil” my imagination by reading about it (it’s not my favorite method), but beforehand I can say that only nothing is constant and everything existing else is relative.
---I agree that gravity can be interpreted as distortion of space, but categorically not as attraction among bodies; I have my own view about it, but absolutely agree that Universe has a foam-like structure,
And partly agree that:
“Our Sun is contained within one of these small Space-Time enclosures, inside which the effect of gravity from the Sun can be felt but outside of this Space-Time enclosure, there is no gravitational effect from the Sun”,
Because I don’t think that this effect is from the Sun, but I believe that this effect is contained in Sun’s space-time.
---I don’t believe into existence of black holes
---And do you strongly believe that time “flows“ only in one direction? I don’t assert, but do you believe that the past can never be a future? Is it really ferroconcrete? I only say that if this universe stops and begins to spin in opposite direction, you’ll say again that time “flows” only in one direction.
Generally, I also think that your theory is sound concept, constructed from original thought (if it makes any difference, as I’m not an expert and not considered an authority).

Good luck!