[Lloyd Gillespie]

The way I see it we are trying to define two entirely different absolutes. I only accept one absolute___The absolute one law of the universe is___The infinite thermal space matter motion is one single ground state entity. This is, imo, the universal ground state mechanics explanation, in and of itself___This law of one law is the law of all law. This represents just a simple common sense mechanics of the ground state of the infinite universe. The absolute model I'm representing is just this one law state of___"The Absolute" is infinite thermal space matter motion, further interpreted all the way to the finite singularity___the rest is quantum and relative history. It never stops changing state___motion...

If you would ever take the time to just think through the simple mechanics above, you'd easily see the truth of all worlds. I think it's just too simple to understand. It's always been here, right in front of our eyes___nothing but cold and hot, slow and fast matter motions... It's classically simple___no complexity what-so-ever. The only absolute is this always and forever changing ground state. The science and physics is absolute state changes___there is no other science and physics___except possibly the unchanging infinite space/void___then, I don't know about that...

Infinity, the infinite space void is the thinnest mass density possible to exist___It's obvious___it's cold___it's thermal___it's matter___it's motion___it's linear___it's "The Absolute"___it's absolute state change in all its dynamics. Now, do you want to make it into a classical model, all the way to the first singularity___or not? I do. I'd like your help, as it will answer all questions, and fill in science's and physics' weakest link___the fact of no logical or mathematical link between the ground state of infinity, and the finite singularity___it had to produce...