[humanbydefault]

When we hear the word "eather" in case it wasn't brought to our attention to be criticized and attacked, we visualize the vast space between planets and stars. It could sound weird having to accept the idea that someone conceive the eather as a whole system from the deepest center of the smaller atoms to the confines of our universe. Sometimes the weirdest ideas are the ones carrying the weight of the truth... who knows.

There have been plenty of examples in physics where we believe to having found the perfect theory capable of explaining everything and we end up making fun of ourselves. I've written many articles and posts about the consistency of the so-called "Pauli Exclusion Principle." By looking at the theoretical cathegory of what a principle means in physics, we are talking about something almost universaly recognized as absolute.

Then... lately in some controversial experiments with certain insulator a group of researchers found themselves beating their heads against the wall in front of what they believe to be a clear violation of a principle we thought to be universal in nature.

I urge you [especially those new members interested in the subject] to take some time and search in the internet about recent publications objecting Pauli's Principle.

Now! If you asked me what I think... I have to get back to the beginning of this thread and make a couple of analogies so you will see why the paradox.

"Pauli's principle" describes the "occupancy of electrons" in each atomic orbit. It is based in the law of physics that says that any force will follow the square of the distance effect... just as magnetism. the magnetic force will decline in strength [in a square proportionality] as we move far away from the closest point.

I do not agree with the actual structure of the atom [for those who haven't read my model you could always go back to my first threads and take a closer look at my physical images] and for that reason I can understand why Pauli's principle must be violated in heavier atoms as in fact happens.

Have you encountered in the table of elements the obvious discrepancies in some elements [chromium and others] with respect to the "electron occupancy?"

I believe that we have had this violation for a long time now... we were just blind to see why these type of "paradigms" occur. For those who accept the structure of matter [the atomic structure] as a sort of compact association of quasi-particles linked to each other by a combination of four forces the paradox will be stronger than ever and the "light at the end of the tunnel" will get farther and farther away from you.

Try to open you minds and for a short interval of time concentrate your attention during a short voayage into the deepest place of the universe.

I'll ask you to [at least for amoment] accept that the materialistic reality we are accostumed to see, touch and measure is not a sort of "zooming" of the same thing but it is made as we jump from one scale to the next above. It is a sort of building reality from the basis to the top. De Broglie found that those levels we call electrons were also distributed in what he compared to standing waves in sound. That was one of the greatest observations in the beginnings of quantum mechanics and somehow it was kidnapped and transformed to be adapted to a new concept of particles with their own right to exist.

I don't plan to go back into the history of those controversial concepts instead I will try to resume what is that I see. To me those spinning sub-atomic particles are nothing but that De Broglie found in his mind: standing waves of a constantly transforming energy [a high energy point interacting with others in the context of an interference]. We know that wave interference could be constructive and destructive and that is what causes [in my personal opinion] the sudden and unexplainable disappearance of entire "electroinc orbits" spinning around the atom'c core. The principle we believe universal falls into questionings because we can't admit that the problem is found in the erroneous model we have taken for granted for more than a century now.

Reality at the atomic level [and beyond] is subject to peocess occuring in deeper levels or scales we ussually don't have access to. Both, the weird irregularities in the electronic occupancy of certain atoms and the recently discovered phenomena in those insulating materials is entirely LOGICAL and there are all backed up by human COMMON SENSE.

Our problem begun with the first assumptions coming from those who discovered the first signs of problems. It was Neils Bohr who said that we can no longer speak about an electron as a particle or as a wave since those subatomic particles "behave" according to the setting of our experimental "apparatus." To me that implies a contradiction that I'm willing to discuss with you in a second:

If we consider the accepted denomination of a particle, we have to say that a particle is something whose existence can't be eliminated or make to disappear. However if we assumed that a wave or the interference of waves could in fact make the appearance of a particle [even if the existence of that particular particle is real in a off and on basis] why not looking for another answer to the nature of matter?

I believe that the existence of matter as a progressive and constructive interaction of energies [working from the very core of each atom] acquires the status of reality given the fact that there is an eather out-there forcing it to exist as it is.
We are aware of the huge space this universe of ours takes... Why not conceiving that as the eather changes in different regions of the universe other types of matter also could make its appearance in a new sort of reality entirely ALIEN to us?

In my personal views, it is the eather what determines and condition the materialistic existence of matter in our universe [the one we live in]. God knows what other forms of matter or semi-matter may be encountered in far regions of this universe. For me... the table of elements is just a LOCAL achievement in the knowledge of matter. The alphabet of elements is incomplete and it is the density of the eather [what we don't know in its secrets] what will have the last word.


HUMANBYDEFAULT