View Single Post
Re: Toronic Concepts
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
theunify
2nd degree Black Belt
theunify is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 324
Thanks Given: 24
Thanked 8x in 8 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 9
   
Re: Toronic Concepts - 11-22-2006, 09:12 PM

Hi David I think I'm starting to understand how concrete your theory is, its not flawed, but it demands a few quanities be defined.

The problem I am having is Va is largly undefined. IF Vu and Vr happen to be opposites of each other then Va is clearly not a valid quanitity, and Vu would be opposite to Vr during the intial phases of the big bang where Vu would dominate and Vr would be undetectable or vice versa. If we can introduce a Constant, let's call this our Axiomatic constant of P.
Va-(Va*P)=Vb, where Vb=Vu+Vr, clearly Vr and Vu can then be defined as compliments, otherwise I do not know what they are.

Then if we look to go further and consider a normal version of the process are we not getting beyond what a physisist is looking for? Shouldn't we leave normalization up to the computer models?

Please comment on my idea that normalization is an aproximation and that Toronics should be consistant before it becomes imaginable.
  
Reply With Quote