[theunify]

I think what I'm saying is your law doesn't hold up for a singularity because at that moment Vu, and Vr would merge. We could get around this by adding another constant, but the constant will have to satisfy a few contraints;
it will have to be able to produce motion, forever, therefore it has to be less than 1.
it will have to produce absolute motion, therefore the constant itself has to be an extreme value.
the third condition is that the constant has to be symetrical, or produce symetrical motion


because Va lacks a constant less than one it runs into the problem of not being able to produce absolute motion unless we say "let there be light."

I fear I am slowing indoctrinating you into my theory, however I am convinced we can use V values to at least prove toronics is possible.

My question is again, Do you think that once a TOE is invented, whether it be Toronics, Tornadics, that that theory will lend itself immediately to normalization?
Will a theorist be required to normalize it himself, or is it just his job to provide definable quantities from which to aproximate? such as Va=Vr+Vu after the singularity.

"reference all motion values to that P quantitative value. This would be a mathematical normalization such to say P=1/c." yes I believe this is the precise direction I am heading, that is to say if 1/c is the inverse of absolute motion, then you have found the constant I was implying.