Theory of Everything - View Single Post

Guille · 05-06-2005, 01:13 PM

I think omni's post was right: If you are talking about the universe, then there are 4d; scientifically-oficially-speaking, of course. There are many "diff nº of dimensions" theories. But the dimensions of the universe is actually the number of dimensions that the maximum-dimensional objects have in the universe. In this universe, the maximum-dimenisonal obejects is matter, and it has 4d. that's why we say the universe is 4dimensional. but energy, for example, is 3d. Antonio Lao's continuose and quantized spaces are 2 and 1 dimesnional consecutively.

	(#3 (permalink))
Guille The Thinker Status: Offline Posts: 3,278 Thanks Given: 14 Thanked 9x in 9 Posts Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47	05-06-2005, 01:13 PM I think omni's post was right: If you are talking about the universe, then there are 4d; scientifically-oficially-speaking, of course. There are many "diff nº of dimensions" theories. But the dimensions of the universe is actually the number of dimensions that the maximum-dimensional objects have in the universe. In this universe, the maximum-dimenisonal obejects is matter, and it has 4d. that's why we say the universe is 4dimensional. but energy, for example, is 3d. Antonio Lao's continuose and quantized spaces are 2 and 1 dimesnional consecutively.