Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing  Lloyd;
The problem I see with this oneness approach is the same that I see with “WSM” forum approach, no functional mechanism for what constitutes a particle structure.[My model features a particle structure process in the universe's first finite singularity] Also this does not provide satisfactory explanations for the conservation laws and especially the concept of inertial mass.[My model accomplishes both of these with ease___it's a simple classical S1 motion of S2 motions explanation] This approach is one I tried over 30 years ago and it did not pan out then so I evolved my concept to the current 4 axioms.[David, I also tried, and even copy-righted, in 1991, the almost exact absolute motion model you are proposing___the only difference was I used two electrons approaching each other at absolute velocity___this was before I realized S1 space is non-quantumized linear only motion___herein lies the key___no Dirac sea angular particle impedance to S1 matter motion increase, thus allowing the possibility of high kenetic energy creation through high inertial mass increase] Though motion can vary within a system, the total will always be an absolute and thus the conservation of mass and energy are preserved even though they should be called conservation of matter and motion.[The conservation of matter and motion can also be conserved in an eternally unchanging S1 ground state containing the S2 finite state changes in matter motions___the key is first centered, first quantumized___then the true laws of conservation, we know, begin, not before___there's nothing to be conserved in the initial S1 state, as it's all one absolute thermal matter motion] There is no doubt that the thermodynamic interpretations of thermal behavior is a must in any real concept.
I don’t think you realize that I have thought these scenarios out over the past 40 years or so. I have not seen any new concepts that I have not tried in the past. If you apply these ideas to all the known facts of science and compare them to the functional mathematics, you will find that the oneness concept will indeed fail.[And I can show you where it won't fail.]
If you like, we can go into detail discussion of your concept and save mine for latter, or we can present both concepts side by side for comparison. What path would you like to take? |
David, I think we need to present both at the same time, for comparrison clarity. This may pose difficulties, but I think it the most productive in the end, as this way we can correct and blend each's ideas into one truly workable model.
On another note, David, I think you should realize I also have thought these ideas through for over fifty years. I was raised in a family of scientists. I started work in the nuclear energy industry in 1969. Through the many years since, I have inter-acted and been friends with many physicists. I am still friends with many physicists, and I did grow up with some who work as IBM's, G.E's, and Dupont's top team physics leaders. I argue with them as much as you and others___I always have. David, I've been inside containment with the real high-rad-drifters. We've had the HP's showing us the ground base of staying alive under high radiation conditions for years. I've seen the prettiest light show known to man___peering into the reactor core when the lid is lifted off. It's so beautiful, it almost makes you want to jump in___though I'll pass on that one. Though I speak a different language than anyone talking about physics, I assure you I have been taught by the best, and even taught a few others much, myself. It's just the nuclear industry has an entirely different dialogue, since it's a mix of construction workers and physicists, etc., it's still a very effective hands-on process of schooling and learning. I happen to be one of the ones that's asked the really deep and hard questions for the safety physicists to answer, when all new trainees are going through classes___You'd truly be surprised what takes place behind those machine-gun guarded gates at nuke plants.
Regards,
Lloyd