Unify, IMO, you have stated 3 conjectured Genesis statements about science, without any scientific grounds, what-so-ever. All science must be grounded in science___tests___laws___logics___observations___o r it ain't science. Please ground all your ideas in an absolute provable testable scientific motion process.
Regards,
Lloyd
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunify  Ok scientists I submitted my new article, and I must say it's a big improvement, although the introduction is a little off, and a few coded tags show up. I've PM'ed Robert to delete my first article, and I've been working for 4 hours this morning on this.
Lloyd now I feel more confident to answer your question about ground state with relation to my theory.
You ask
Lloyd Let's do two things, Obey the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, and explain how we get from ground state to increased entropy.
If we want to follow my theory, there are three parts: First we give existance to a matter particle
Second we give definition to motion by disintegration
Third we assign a constant which produces infinite expansion.
1. To create the matter particle we first grapple with the tough question "What caused the big-bang?" or more importantly "What came before the big-bang?" The answer to this is nothing, a void of geometric space, much like a stage. Then we ask what is a void in geometric language? Answer. A void is an infinite black sphere.
Since we have defined a void as a sphere based on the fact that is satisfies the definition of a void, we can see that a sphere is simply another name for a particle. Even though we call this nothing... it's just a label, it indeed has form, enough form to quantify it with geometry.Hence we can label it as anti-matter or matter, it doesn't matter at this point, there is no option for comparison.
2. This is where the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics comes into play. Since we have a form, of no mass, the law stands that we can use zero energy, to create motion without violating the Law, a mathematical/geometric trick. But it allows us to proceed in the process called the big-bang. And my theory is that spheres produce motion, by dividing. See my article, chapter 3. It's mathematically proven that a sphere divided in two adds to it's radius but "conserves its mass/energy"
3. The big-bang can be termed "Disintegration" since we have a particle, and we are enacting a sufficient force...i.e 0, to cause that particle to entropy into more particles. At this point it becomes more relevant to call the particle matter, and any operation on it is a meaningfull one. Therefore it obeys the velocity of light. And a constant has to be chosen to show this. From the example of dividing spheres we have a clue/hint at the constant we are looking for. The constant is the value of 1 aproaching 0. An infinitesimal number. The reason for this is because this is the value that produces the most motion over time, and hence it is compatible with relativity saying that light speed is the maximum attainable speed.
Conclusions and other TOE Discussion.
If you have followed the law called the law of disintegration you'll see that since we only got one constant all particles are "self-similar" to this big-bang particle and therefore follow the same laws. We can only deduce that these are the photons, and indeed photons operate on the same Law of Disintegration,
An overall Unification, but still unnormalized.
|