 "The way I see it..."
Ask anyone about the theoretical differences between SPACE and EATHER and see what you get! [probably confusion and silence...].
Today I will write something that will make you meditate for more than a "long time."
Could we say that 3D space equals the eather? ABSOLUTELY NOT!
And that, ladies and gentlemen the key to understand everything I've said up to this moment in countless threads all these years... Those concepts are very different from one-another... I'll explain:
Everyhting we consider to be integral part of the universe, every region we can or can't not reach with the help of our potent telescopes, stars and their solar systems... those are part of the eathereal body where our existence takes place.
On the other hand, 3 dimensional SPACE is just how we perceive the structure and nature of this eather by itself. It migh seems a little complex to grasp now, but believe me... it's not.
Let's take the example of TIME. I'VE SAID THAT time is the "tool," "the measuring system" employed to "keep up" with the normal evolution of the universe and its processes [entropy]. Time is just a measurement of those changes that we are exposed to across our entire lives. The rising of the sun, the lapse during a TV program, the length of our lives,etc. We have used a sort of "universal" system of units [seconds, minutes, hours and their decimals]. BUT time depends [eventually] on the nature of the eather that exists all around us. As I've said before, as the eather density changes across different scales, so the actual rate of the measure system used. That's why we can't find a "match" when comparing two or more physical processes occuring in different eather states.. clear so far?
Now! SPACE is just the same! The same way our perception of TIME changes with the density of the eather around us, so the way we perceive 3 dimensional space. You see.... there is and always be a 3 dimensional space "out-there" [do not fall into a confusion here] what is no the same is the topography that different regions of the universe will present with respect to a very particular notion of 3D space chosen by us [in our scale] for reference... understood?
We can't find a "discontinued" patch or spot of the vacuum where NOTHING exists in it, The absolute vacuum is impossible inside the universe as we know it, therefore the INTERFACE the "frontier" between different scales must show a "zone" where 3D space adopts a different topography [a different scale of continuity] with respect to the one a level below or above.
The atom, for example. Human scientists have classified this "interfacing zone" in 4 forces... which I do not agree with at all.
The "strong nuclear force, the weak force, the electro-magnetic force and gravity." For me, they are the results of the same [unique] energy that is concentrated [if you which] inside the nucleus of each atom and through a series of interactions with similar energies is capable of moving from one level of [high] energy to a lower energy-level using nothing more than what I named in my book "STANDING NUCLEAR WAVES."
If you look up to books studying sound and music, you'll find how the way sound is perpetuated in its existence through-out time is by standing waves. Somehow energy keeps moving from one source to the one opposing the first and no energy could be lost [ in an ideal situation of course!].
We know that the energy used to cause a [needed] vibration in the air molecules, allowing the trasmission of sound, will cause a slow depletion of the energetic reserves of both vibrational energies and eventually both sounds will weaken until they're gone.
I'll continue with this issue later on....
Take care!
HUMANBYDEFAULT  |