Quote:
Originally Posted by humanbydefault  Let's assume that I'm right. Anti-light can and do exists in the way I depicted above... Let's also assume that some far regions of the universe are scattering light in a RELATIVISTIC opposite spin with respect to our common light.... What would we be able to "receive" in our telescopes while watching those regions?
If very far from our reachings, "anti-light" bringing the proper info about the existence of even far located region of the same universe of ours collided one-another... disappeared even before getting visible to us... would that be seen as "dark matter?"
We know about the existence of matter by the scatterings of radiation energy previously absorbed by that matter. That's why we account for the existence of planets and moons around us. But what if a big part of this universe were so far from us that the series of eathereal scales in between would resulting in a perfect "spin-transitional effect" causing us to appear "blind" with respect to their existence?
Something similar was written by myself not long ago in a thread I discussed possible cloaking devices... remember it?
Once again.... Do you really think that we are "entittled" to observe the entire creation? Don't you agree with me that understanding the way things must work could give us a clue of things we won't be able to discover for many many centuries in the future?
HUMANBYDEFAULT |
I think you could be onto something here my friend,I will comment more when i get back
home,at the moment i am in maderia in a hotel internet room,and someone is standing over my shoulder!
regards michael.