Theory of Everything - View Single Post

dleviwing · 05:51 PM

Lloyd;
I know the thinking process you are proposing and I refuse to be drawn into your enigma. Now, do you really want me to comment on how asinine your approach is? I know that, when you know that, we can talk science. Do not ask me dumb loaded questions and then claim I have not answered you; Who is more arrogant and pretentious Lloyd; the one with over 40 years in the profession of science, or the truck driver, cook, electrician, student, or economist who are telling us how stupid we’ve been?
-----------------------------------------------
To propose a solution to the before, it is best to know the science of the now. Scientist have no problems with the term “infinity” but, philosophers do. The axioms I’ve stated allows for many scenarios yet you insist on using the interpretation of “singularity”. This has already been expressed in the standard model that we both disagree with. If you wish to refer to Stephen Hawking in these regards, I would suggest you look up his 1968 paper on micro-singularities. If you wish to read more about absolute motion concepts and superluminal velocities, I would suggest you read the science papers of Professor Reginald T. Cahill of the FlindersUniversity. You shouldn’t base your knowledge of science on the best seller list. The real scientist do not make that list, nor do they try to.

The Toronic concept started by viewing all terminologies of “energy” as being nothing more the action or interaction of physical substance in motion. Eventually this lead to realizing that to conserve mass and energy, motion must be conserved and yet if motion could be exchanged, then potential energy could not exist. The result was to make an assumption that motion was a property that could not be exchanged nor could it be altered in its total quantity within any system. This lead to the comprehension that mass was also a function of motion and thus the concept of uniform motion as being the cause of mass resulted.

The state of the substance of the universe today is made up of various interactions of vibrating substance, thus we can describe many interactions in terms of wave mechanics but, particles require a means to confine these wave functions. This is done by angular momentum and thus “rest mass” is also caused by uniform motion. Now when you look at the mathematics, you can start to have a minds eye view of what is physically occurring and why scientist talk about dimensions outside our realm of measurement as being the wave symmetry of the particles. Both the volume and waves are beyond our current technologies of measure.

Once we expand our understanding of wave mechanics we also find that it explains why we do not have much anti-matter in our universe. Anti-matter is an odd harmonic function that becomes an even harmonics function upon most interactions within their environment; even if this interaction is destructive wave interference (total mass to energy conversion).

	(#13 (permalink))
dleviwing The Observer Status: Offline Posts: 1,813 Thanks Given: 26 Thanked 186x in 151 Posts Join Date: Jan 2005 Rep Power: 36	11-30-2006, 03:59 PM Lloyd; I know the thinking process you are proposing and I refuse to be drawn into your enigma. Now, do you really want me to comment on how asinine your approach is? I know that, when you know that, we can talk science. Do not ask me dumb loaded questions and then claim I have not answered you; Who is more arrogant and pretentious Lloyd; the one with over 40 years in the profession of science, or the truck driver, cook, electrician, student, or economist who are telling us how stupid we’ve been? ----------------------------------------------- To propose a solution to the before, it is best to know the science of the now. Scientist have no problems with the term “infinity” but, philosophers do. The axioms I’ve stated allows for many scenarios yet you insist on using the interpretation of “singularity”. This has already been expressed in the standard model that we both disagree with. If you wish to refer to Stephen Hawking in these regards, I would suggest you look up his 1968 paper on micro-singularities. If you wish to read more about absolute motion concepts and superluminal velocities, I would suggest you read the science papers of Professor Reginald T. Cahill of the FlindersUniversity. You shouldn’t base your knowledge of science on the best seller list. The real scientist do not make that list, nor do they try to. The Toronic concept started by viewing all terminologies of “energy” as being nothing more the action or interaction of physical substance in motion. Eventually this lead to realizing that to conserve mass and energy, motion must be conserved and yet if motion could be exchanged, then potential energy could not exist. The result was to make an assumption that motion was a property that could not be exchanged nor could it be altered in its total quantity within any system. This lead to the comprehension that mass was also a function of motion and thus the concept of uniform motion as being the cause of mass resulted. The state of the substance of the universe today is made up of various interactions of vibrating substance, thus we can describe many interactions in terms of wave mechanics but, particles require a means to confine these wave functions. This is done by angular momentum and thus “rest mass” is also caused by uniform motion. Now when you look at the mathematics, you can start to have a minds eye view of what is physically occurring and why scientist talk about dimensions outside our realm of measurement as being the wave symmetry of the particles. Both the volume and waves are beyond our current technologies of measure. Once we expand our understanding of wave mechanics we also find that it explains why we do not have much anti-matter in our universe. Anti-matter is an odd harmonic function that becomes an even harmonics function upon most interactions within their environment; even if this interaction is destructive wave interference (total mass to energy conversion). David Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 05:51 PM.