| Re: "einstein's Myth: Space-time" I can't see where your dirision of me came from in you first reply.
I merely stated that your energy packets needed NOT to be static in order to be part of the greater interactions.
When you calmed down a bit in your second post , we were in much more agreement and I have little to oppose in your statements.
However. I get angry when I see the term "energy" used as if it were magic.
Time and again a behaviour is explained because "energy" causes it to be so. "forces" is another of my hates. Because , like energy they become the conjeuring tricks of nature.
Interactions are all that can exsist. Period. I may not be the best physicist on the block , but i know that even a standing wave must be the sum of interacting parts .
Fundementals can only exsist in our imaginations until we gain knowledge of what begets the smallest(largest) object in our reality to "exist".
Your "standing wave " sounds pretty good to me as a state. My interest lies in what makes up , what makes that state. And so on.
Honestly searching for answers
Iseason |