Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Is this the reason why a theory for a quantum of mass could not be formulated? |
Yes. In part.
My ENTIRE last post is why there will never be a theory for a quantum of mass within the existing paradigm of mathematics and physics.
There will also never be a theory for all that is NOT mass. Keeping in mind, that all "mass" must contain space and time, as well as be contained by space and time.
The present paradigm of mathematics and physics will never prove EMPTY, SOLID, WAVE, VIBRATION, CHARGE, SPEED, DISTANCE, DIRECTION, ROTATION, BEGINNING, END, etc.
When it comes to PROMLEMATIC INFINITIES, physics DISREGARDS and mathematics CHEATS. OK, a nicer way to put it, is it "fudges".
Infinity is out there, beyond "finite", disproving it at every turn. It will continue to do this forever. The is no actual beginning or end to finite, nor the logic that supports it. It is a complete wast of time and money. The only justification it has, is that it has shown us what the answer is NOT.
What it boils down to, is the limitation of RELATIVE LOGIC; which is the only logic that's been used in 2,500 years.
There's one very simple piece of ABSOLUTE LOGIC, that needs to be recognized, before we can come to understanding EXISTENCE.
What is terribly IRONIC in all of this, is that it was established by PARMENIDES, who is considered the father of all western philosophy and science. Socrates and Plato both considered him the wisest of all.
He established a LOGICAL ABSOLUTE, but couldn't get inside of it. We've been bouncing around inside of his absolute ever since, beginning in essence, with Zeno's paradoxs.
We are at a PARADOXICAL PRECIPICE in science, and CERN is not going to solve it.
If CERN doesn't blow up, the results will come back INCONCLUSIVE. They may think they've found something conclusive, but it will never pan out logically. How long it will take them to realize this, is anybody's guess.