[humanbydefault]

THE ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY OF RESEARCHERS IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGISTS HAS ASKED THEMSELVES THE SAME QUESTION FOR MORE THAN A CENTURY:

>>>>>> "WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED DURING THE VERY FIRST MOMENTS FOLLOWING "THE BANG!..."?

>>>>>> WHY IS IT THAT ALL OUR EQUATIONS AND METHEMATICS FAIL TO EXPLAIN THOSE INITIAL INSTANTS AFTER THE EVENT?


I'm not that old to have witness the phenomenon, but I think I have a pretty convincing argument... more like a logical hypothesis...and based on my theory about matter.... to answer both questions.

BEFORE I BEGIN WITH THE ACTUAL EXPLOSION, I THINK IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO DEFINE SOME CONCEPTS WE'LL NEED TO DESCRIBE WHAT WAS "ON THE TABLE" AND WHAT WASN'T (!)

MANY OF US HAVE, AT SOME POINT IN OUR LIVES, THE "CHANCE" TO WATCH INTERESTING AND INGENIOUS COMPUTER ANIMATIONS ABOUT "HOW THAT BEGINNING COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED IF WE WERE THERE TO SEE IT..." I'M NOT GOING TO CRITICIZE THEM NOR TO GIVE YOU MY PERSONAL IMAGE ON THE EVENT THAT TOOK PLACE EVEN BEFORE THE BIRTH WHAT WE CONSIDER TODAY AS THE UNIVERSE... IT WOULD BE VERY FOOLISH AND IT WOULD MAKE NO DIFFERENCE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW ABOUT THE SUBJECT.

LET'S BEGIN WITH WHAT I SUPPOSE EVERY ONE HERE MUST AGREE ON:

1>>> AS EVERY COMMON EXPLOSION, THIS ONE WAS NO DIFFERENT: ENERGY EXPANDED IN ALL DIRECTION FROM A CENTER OR CORE DISPLAYING A FAIRLY STRAIGH PATH OUTWARD.

THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT FACT I WANT YOU TO ANALYZE... IF YOU ARE HERE WITH ME IN THIS READINGS. NO DOUBTS THAT IF THAT POWERFUL ENERGY REACHED A CRITICAL POINT IN WHICH BURST IN ALL DIRECTIONS:

>>>> DURING THE FIRST BILLIONTH OF THE VERY FIRST SECOND [ACCORDING TO OUR HUMAN-CONCEIVED CONCEPT OF "TIME"...] AT NO TIME WAS A SPINNING PROCESS OF ANY KIND POSSIBLE IN THE RECENTLY BORNE "COSMOS."

ENERGY FLEW IN A STRAIGH PATH OUTWARD AND, GIVEN THE POWER AND INTENSITY OF THE EXPLOSION, SPIN COULD NOT HAVE BEEN A POSSIBLE PHYSICAL EVENT UNTIL MUCH MORE LATER ON (!)

THAT SIMPLE HYPOTHETICAL "FACT" ONLY FUNDAMENTED BY HUMAN LOGIC [I MAY ADD...] IS IN MY PERSONAL OPINION THE KEY TO UNDERSTAND WHY PHYSICS BRAKES DOWN (DURING THOSE FIRST MOMENTS OF THE GENESIS) WITHOUT ANY AVAILABLE HELP!!!

THINK ABOUT IT! NO EATHER! NO MATTER SINCE THERE WAS NO SPIN, NO INTERFERENCE YET BETWEEN THOSE PRIMARY SPEKS OF ENERGY, AND NO ENTROPY IN THE REAL SENSE!!!

OUR EQUATIONS INCLUDE THE CLASSICAL AND CONVENTIONAL CONCEPTS OF "TIME", "MASS", "MATTER", "SPACE" AND [ALTHOUGH NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED YET BY EVERY ONE] "EATHER." (!)

OUR UNIVERSE, THE ONE WE OBSERVE IN OUR TELESCOPES IS THE DIRECT RESULT OF A COMPLEX STRUCTURE OF SPINNING BODIES OF ALL SIZES AND COLORS. GALAXIES, STARS, CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES AND BILLION OF PLANETARY BODIES INCLUDING THEIR MOONS AND ASTEROIDS AND METEORITES... ALL OF THEM "PLAYING" SOME SORT OF "MERRY-GO-ROUND" GAME AROUND THEIR OWN CENTER.
MY THEORY ABOUT THE ATOM ITSELF IS NOT CONCEIVABLE WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF STANDING WAVES ... WHICH IN FACT IS JUST ANOTHER FORM OF SPINNING PATTERN IN ITS NATURE.

THE BIRTH OF THE UNIVERSE WAS MISSING A BUNCH OF FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL LAWS AND ENTITIES RULED BY THOSE LAWS BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T EVEN THERE WHEN THAT HAPPEN!!!
THE EXPANSION HAD TO SLOW DOWN ITS SPEED IN ORDER FOR THOSE CUMULES OF ENERGY TO SETTLE DOWN AND START INTERACTING WITH EACH OTHER JUST LIKE IT HAPPENED IN THE CORE OF EVERY ATOM.

MATTER WAS BROUGHT INTO THE "UNIVERSAL REALITY EQUATION" LONG AFTER THOSE FIRST EMANATION OF ENERGY HAD "THE OPPORTUNITY" TO STAY CLOSER ENOUGH TO "FEEL" THE PULL TOWARD EACH OTHER. THE ATTRACTION I'VE EXPLAINED TO YOU WHEN WE DISCUSSED THE "CASIMIR EFFECT" AND ITS SIMILARITIES IN ITS BASIC PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES COULDN'T BE POSSIBLE UNLESS THE FIRST INTERFERENCE TOOK PLACE.... IN OTHER WORDS, NOT UNTIL THE FIRST STANDING WAVE APPEARED IN THE NEWLY BORNE UNIVERSE, THE NEEDED ATTRACTION BETWEEN THE FIRST COMPONENTS OF THE FUTURE STARS AND FIRST ATOMS WAS NOT READY TO EXIST YET.

WITH THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF THE VERY FIRST "STANDING WAVE" PHENOMENON [THE FIRST ATTEMPT FOR SURVIVAL] ENTROPY ACQUIRED A NEW MEANING.

I'D LIKE TO THINK ABOUT THE FIRST STANDING WAVE EVENT IN OUR UNIVERSE AS THE FIRST CRY OF A NEWLY BORNE "BABY." NOT UNTIL THE VERY FIRST CRY THE DOCTOR COULDN'T BE ENTIRELY SURE ABOUT A SUCCESFUL DELIVERY OF THE NEW LIFE.

BEFORE THE UNIVERSE'S "FIRST CRY" THERE WAS NO "LIFE" TO ACCOUNT FOR!!! TIME AS THE HUMAN WAY OF MEASURING THE ENTROPY OF THE UNIVERSE HAD NO MEANNINGFUL MEANNING AT ALL. ENTROPY BEGUN WITH THE FIRST STANDING WAVE AND THE FIRST SIGN OF ENERGY TO SAVE ITS OWN INSIDE "THE PERFECT SOLUTION."

AS I MENTIONED TO YOU BEFORE.. IT WAS NO OTHER CHOICE AND IT COULDN'T BE PREVENTED EITHER!!!

DID YOU KNOW THAT EINSTEIN USED TO ASK HIMSELF MANY TIMES THE SAME THING?

"WAS THERE ANY OTHER CHOICE FOR THIS UNIVERSE BUT TO EXIST...?" I THINK I HAVE THE ANSWER TO HIS ETERNAL QUESTION:

"THERE WAS'NT ANY!" EVEN IF WE WOULD TO START ALL OVER AGAIN... WITH THE FIRST "CRY" AND THE BIRTH OF MASS, TIME AND EVENTUALLY MATTER THE UNIVERSE WOULD GO THROUGH A SIMILAR PROCESS OF DEVELOPEMENT WITH OTHER SHAPE, OTHER LIFE SPECIES, OTHER COSMOLOGICAL CHARTS BUT NEVER EVER WITHOUT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING:

ITS INNATE [INHERENT] ABILITY TO "SURVIVE" DISSIPATION [DESTRUCTION AND DEATH]... THE REPETITION OF THE "PERFECT SOLUTION" OVER AND OVER AGAIN!

I HOPE I DIDN'T BORED YOU WITH MY THOUGHTS IN THIS PARTICULAR SUBJECT... FOR ME [AT LEAST] THERE IS NO MEANNING TO SPEAK ABOUT MATTER, MASS OR EVEN TIME DURING THOSE MOMENTS BEFORE THE FIRST "CRY." THERE WAS NO "LIFE" IN THE BABY YET AND THEREFORE OUR EQUATIONS, NUMBERS AND CONCEPTS WERE SIMPLY IRRELEVANT THEN AS THEY WILL BE... THE NEXT TIME.


HUMANBYDEFAULT