[Lloyd Gillespie]

And what is there in all this to support there not being a center? And, I did read the article... Any initial center would have long ago vanished due to space/matter curvature of galaxie motions and time, would it not? Einstein did believe in curved space, and I do believe in time erasing such initial motion maps, especially with all the inter-galactic space storms. I see no inconsistencies with center, expanding universe, and the homogeneous, isotropic nature of the universe. We know galaxies collide, as your earlier posts pictures show, so this would mean, over time, the nature of space's motions are multidirectional, at best[thermal space storms?]. Such multidirectionalism would certainly disguise any early big bang motions' center. The thermodynamic dual fields of the aether[my conjecture], that everyone wants to keep ignoring, is very complex. May I point out that the hot quantum angular motion and spin aether field, is impossible of producing the cold linear motion aether field___it, by the laws of physics, must exist in its initial infinite ground macro/micro state, along side, within and without, the hot quantum angular motion and spin aether field, otherwise, the universe would experience heat death. Hot motion cannot produce cold motion, but cold motion must produce hot motion___it's its radiation requirement___all motion radiates heat. Such an initial ground state field requires a center, as its matter motion is thermodynamically required to implode, to just such a center, i.e., big bang from initial infinite space thermal matter motions, to a center. Thermodynamics is, by its very nature, the initially imploding uncaused cause of all matter motion___matter motion must exist eternally, by the first law of thermodynamics___conservation of matter/energy. I think Baud, this is much easier to understand, than the foolishness of the big bang coming from nothing, don't you?

Just imagine the real and most likely conditions at the initial state explosion of a real matter big bang. IMO, it is far from what has been thus far theorized. This was no simple explosion of space and or matter, there would have been no vacuum, at the moment of explosion, as the explosion would have been required to create the finite space vacuum, the temperature outside this dis-equilibriated explosion was most likely absolute zero, the explosion temperture would have most likely been trillions of degrees hotter than what has been theorized, as a practical size of such big bang matter would consist of all the matter, and more, presently in the finite universe, as a considerable sum has radiated away, thus just imagine folding all the universe's galaxies, or at least all their matter, back into one black ball. This would be massive beyond belief, in size, even if we consider an increasing light speed as we go back in time toward the initial event, even though velocity increases mass, and reduces size, it would still have been much more massive than has been so far theorized. Now, consider a many trillions of degrees hot real explosion of real matter, into absolute zero thermal space storms, and the massive initial space storms that such gigantic collisions of matter and energy, in all directions imaginable, would create___this much heat would react so violently against such cold, that it is unimaginable, in our thermal semi-equilibriated universe, to truly comprehend___can you? There would have been massive thunder heads, tornados, hurricanes, twistors, spinors, on and on___unimaginable forces at the initial conditions of such a violent explosion, that it could easily explain all the anomalous multidirections, conditions and spirals of the galactic orders___don't you think? All one needs do is realize how drastic an influence such initial conditions of motions could truly have over time, and I think you can easily see why the initial center would be so disguised, today. Let's put our real thinking caps on, and think about real matter/motion explosions, to try and understand this pragmatically...

regards,