[meg-al]

Why so part-icular? You approach the conundrum from a purely optical/rational perspective. A space musician would drink in the formality of his ideality wholy differently. He would not feel nor experience the spotty granular quantities you glibly surmise.

What do you think of a spiral hour-glass fanbelt theory I have where the serpentine-belt moves about various engines or universes ~ each "universe" has its own function & respective laws: eg. the alternator engine-universe; the power-steering; water pump, etc. This timely belt could enter into any system and orbit or even become component to that "world-view"; but then it would cease being the tangential belt and loose its guru above-it-all detached qualities ~ that all fanbelts require. Notice that electrons behave somewhat like this belt when they spin-off the heavier nuclei-engines. Now, the magical now-you-see-it / now-you-don't happening is that the 3-D of one engine-universe (of say the alternator spinning around) is not discernible to the inherent components of an other system (say the power-steering), and so on. The fan-belt has more of an overview idea of each system it spins off ~ but being at a considerable distance with any particular center it figure-eights with it only has a peripheral figment of an understanding. The hour-glass aspect is the relative potential gestahlt experienced between the various multiple-universes. All these moving timepiece 'verses work in unison just like the various system in our body: cardio-vascular, nervous, skeletal, etc. Metaphorically the head is a part of this hour-glass model with our neck as the narrow stem holding one engine-verse diametrically apart from its yin-yang other... and a particle that makes up the body knows not a particle to the head except through the "belt" of neural-optics or neural-touch ~ the nervous system with its spinal column and dendrites would be somewhat like the fan-belt underneath an engine hood.