Does it mean Turok's theory does not stand?? Then what would be your views on Multiverse or Baby Universe sprouting from our Universes???
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie  No, I do not accept that any phase or matter/density differences of cmbr will show any evidence of one or more big-bangs, as I stated, in order for another universe to form, IMO, it would have to first completely decay, as thermodynamics is not powerful enough to overcome such existing cmbr. It must decay to allow thermodynamics the power to reconstitute a new universe.
This original idea of variations in cmbr was proposed to check if the inflation's model's predictions were correct. If the newest sattelites are able to verify two phase spaces of cmbr, this will only verfy the inflation model, of different stages of universal expansions, since the big-bang. This is the one I accept. CMBR, IMO, can not be used as a guide to how many big-bangs existed, for the already mentioned reasons... Also, just think of the math this would involve in years alone. 10^137 years of light travel___there's no satellite capable of such observations, and cmbr at that number of years mass and light travel would be so far distant, only a three toed Martian could answer such absurdity. Then, before I believe in Martians, show me their droppings...
Regards,
Lloyd |