View Single Post
Re: How many Big bangs?
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
dipayankar
8th degree Black Belt
dipayankar has a spectacular aura about
 
dipayankar's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,207
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 72x in 71 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 26
   
Re: How many Big bangs? - 01-19-2007, 01:17 PM

Wow... that was great. Let me absorb this thing first... that was long..


Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie View Post
True science would tell us it did not come from a point or nothing as the std. model and many quantum models accept. The singularity formed from the fundamental thermal matter motions of infinite eternal uncreated linear space. The way to know this must be true is to realize the existing universe, being perpetual motion, needs a source of finance for its matter/motions. This requires the infinite source of a prime mover, which is a simple uncaused cause. There's only one in the scientific arsenal___thermodynamics and the hydrodynamics of. Since we scientifically know we can't have motion or energy without something to move, a fundamental substance is absolutely required___thus absolute matter, which in turn requires an infinite space to exist in, since finite motion requires an external prime mover for its perpetualness, and thermodynamics being such a weak motioner, the infinite thermal matter motion space theory of matter/energy, before the big-bang is absolutely required. How did it work? It was, IMO, just the most gigantic weather system ever possible to imagine, and all heat radiation created by early motions would have been pushed to a virtual/eventually real center, for trillions of trillions of years, also heating and increasing the fundamental substance size. IMO, somewhere say 10^20 years before the final building of the hydrogen/helium/hydrozine highly compressed mass black gaseous/plasma ball, where quantumization was initiated, it would have started quantum tunneling out into infinite space, before the real explosion. As it exploded into a pre-quantumized finite space, it would have created the vacuum of space, as all explosions create vacuums at their centers. The tremendous violence of this explosion would almost be like imagining infinity itself exploding, even though it was only a small piece of infinity's center. Space storms of massive size would have existed before the final stages, leading to quantum spray, such as quasars, but nothing in intensity after the unimaginable forces of such an explosion. Hurricane and tornado force winds at near the speed of light, much higher then, due to lower mass density of the aether, in all directions, since such violent heat was exploding into virgin 0K. If you've ever seen and heard super-heated steam hitting freezing water, you'd have some idea what the violence would have been. Tornados and hurricans, before and after explosion are what, IMO, shaped the galaxies motions, cmbr and all space curvatures since. Smaller black holes would have been formed from the initial black hole, especially at the wall of the thunder head front, shooting black holes and initial galaxie forming matter in every direction, out and back in, in 360 degrees. This is why we still witness the Hubble speeds of planets at distance, which are really the burned out memories of super-light stars and super-light initial galaxies. Galaxie evolution would have progressed to produce the heavier stars and galaxies of today.

Hope this helps,
LLoyd

p.s.
A final note; The infinite eternal cold thermal is absolutely required to exist to continue the cooling equilibrium of the hot finite space matter motions described above. There is no other source of cold except the infinite linear field, the hot quantumized aether field exists in. The finite universe would have experienced heat death long ago, without the required infinite cold linear field permeating all of finiteness's hot quantum field.
  
Reply With Quote